This article from last Sunday’s Bee describes Sacramento’s increased drainage storage and how it helped during the recent floods, but still notes that the improvements have not helped stop the type of sewage backup that occurred in downtown Sacramento in 2004 and can again. Yuk!!
Excerpts below:
“The heavy rains of last weekend caused sewer pipes to back up, streets to flood, and an unexpected flow of partially treated wastewater into the Sacramento River.
“But however wet and messy it was, the men and women who manage the Sacramento area's sewer and storm drainage systems were grateful things weren't worse.
“That's because the various underground systems are designed to handle up to a 10-year storm event, while the series of storms that dumped five inches or more on the region last weekend were considered a 25-to 50-year event, depending on the location, according to Michael Peterson, principal civil engineer with the Sacramento County Department of Water Resources.
“A 10-year event has a 10 percent chance of happening every year, while a much larger 50-year event has a one in 50 chance of occurring in a given year.
…. “During the past 10 years, the city has spent about $107 million to upgrade the system, which had become notorious for backups during storms. The fixes included vastly increasing the capacity of two large pumping stations, expanding a city treatment plant's capacity to disinfect wastewater and discharge directly into the river during heavy rain events, and installing below-ground storage basins for times of excess rain, Sacramento Utilities Director Gary Reents said.
“During last weekend's storms, the system was effective: The city had just two spots where a small amount of sewage backed up into streets.
“Reents said that if Sacramento received the kind of record-setting rain it got in September 2004, even the latest improvements to the city's sewer and drainage systems could not accommodate the quick rush of water. In the 2004 event, two inches of rain fell in an hour in the downtown area, causing sewage backups that infuriated residents.
"Even with the improvements, there will be storms that are larger than we can accommodate," Reents said.”
Friday, January 13, 2006
Thursday, January 12, 2006
Folsom Dam Fix
This article from today’s Bee continues the taboo against discussing a new dam to control floods in the American River Parkway, instead focusing on large releases, which further degrade the Parkway. The throwaway acknowledgement of the proposed raising of Folsom Dam, (a troubling concept on its face) to increase reservoir capacity won’t do much at all to reduce the large releases that degrade the Parkway.
Maintaining a taboo about public discussion of all of the options to control flooding, whether on the Parkway, or in residential and business areas, is a grave disservice and does little to help the public discussion.
Here is an excerpt from the article:
“Folsom Dam modifications were originally deemed necessary after huge storms in 1986 showed that the eight existing river outlet gates in the main dam were not sufficiently large to release enough water quickly when massive runoff was expected to hit the reservoir.
“The original plan called for enlarging those eight gates and adding two new ones.
“In 1999, Congress authorized a budget of $215 million for the project. But in June 2005, construction firms interested in the job submitted bids as high as $650 million.
“The risk of working on an existing dam - and compromising its limited release capacity during construction - was considered a key factor in the high bids.
“The new approach calls for an auxiliary spillway to be built just south of the existing main dam. This new spillway would include new river outlet gates that could be opened ahead of a storm, like existing gates in the main dam, to empty the reservoir quickly.
“The new gates would be built below the reservoir's maximum water level, but not as deep as the existing gates. This means it is likely they can be built faster, without limiting the dam's current release capacity and without exposing the contractor or the public to as much risk.
“Meanwhile, early research shows the project is likely to achieve the same goal as the original project: giving Sacramento 140-year flood protection by 2013. The city currently has protection from a 100-year flood or a flood with a 1-percent chance of occurring in any given year.
“A related project to increase reservoir capacity by raising Folsom Dam's height, estimated to cost $250 million, would give Sacramento 200-year flood protection.
“The dam raise was originally targeted for completion in 2021. But improved cooperation between the bureau and the corps, better integration of the two projects and simpler construction methods means this ultimate goal could be reached sooner, Matsui said.”
Maintaining a taboo about public discussion of all of the options to control flooding, whether on the Parkway, or in residential and business areas, is a grave disservice and does little to help the public discussion.
Here is an excerpt from the article:
“Folsom Dam modifications were originally deemed necessary after huge storms in 1986 showed that the eight existing river outlet gates in the main dam were not sufficiently large to release enough water quickly when massive runoff was expected to hit the reservoir.
“The original plan called for enlarging those eight gates and adding two new ones.
“In 1999, Congress authorized a budget of $215 million for the project. But in June 2005, construction firms interested in the job submitted bids as high as $650 million.
“The risk of working on an existing dam - and compromising its limited release capacity during construction - was considered a key factor in the high bids.
“The new approach calls for an auxiliary spillway to be built just south of the existing main dam. This new spillway would include new river outlet gates that could be opened ahead of a storm, like existing gates in the main dam, to empty the reservoir quickly.
“The new gates would be built below the reservoir's maximum water level, but not as deep as the existing gates. This means it is likely they can be built faster, without limiting the dam's current release capacity and without exposing the contractor or the public to as much risk.
“Meanwhile, early research shows the project is likely to achieve the same goal as the original project: giving Sacramento 140-year flood protection by 2013. The city currently has protection from a 100-year flood or a flood with a 1-percent chance of occurring in any given year.
“A related project to increase reservoir capacity by raising Folsom Dam's height, estimated to cost $250 million, would give Sacramento 200-year flood protection.
“The dam raise was originally targeted for completion in 2021. But improved cooperation between the bureau and the corps, better integration of the two projects and simpler construction methods means this ultimate goal could be reached sooner, Matsui said.”
Wednesday, January 11, 2006
American River Dam, Background Information
On January 10, 2006, our organization made the decision to support the construction of a major new dam on the American River, including any of its forks, to protect the integrity of the Parkway for the year-round use of the citizens of the Sacramento region, and to provide optimal conditions for the habitat and wildlife of the Parkway.
The key aspect of protecting the integrity of the Parkway is maintaining river flows and temperature in the optimal range for protection of the recreational experience and the health of the salmon. Flood condition flows of 20,000 to 35,000 (and even 115,000 cubic feet per second as in 1986 and 1997) are several times the release levels for optimal protection and result in serious degradation of the Parkway experience.
Our decision is a Parkway centric decision congruent with our mission-driven philosophy that the 5,000 acres of the Parkway comprise the most important acreage in the Sacramento region. We also understand not all agree with this priority and that is one reason the Parkway struggles financially and remains low on the funding priority list.
Our reasoning behind this decision—and our mission of “Preserve, Protect, and Strengthen the American River Parkway, Our Community’s Natural Heart”—is based, primarily, on these factors:
The historical importance of the American River and the Parkway.
1) In 1848 gold was discovered at Coloma on the American River, and this was an event of international proportion, that while clearly tragic for many, was an epic time, as H. W. Brands in his book The Age of Gold: the California Gold Rush and the New American Dream (2002) has noted:
“Yet for all its sordid side, the new American dream was an enormously creative force. It unleashed the energies of the American people, and of the many millions of foreigners who, drawn by this compelling dream, chose to become Americans. (It also unleashed the energies of those who stayed in other countries—or in some important cases, returned to other countries from America—and emulated the Argonauts of California.) It raised the American standard of living beyond anything ever achieved so broadly. It afforded the most basic freedom—freedom from want—to more people than had ever enjoyed such release. And it gave unprecedented meaning to that really revolutionary idea of Thomas Jefferson: that humans have a right to the pursuit of happiness.” (p. 443-444)
2) A personal story: Several years ago while visiting Coloma, where gold was discovered in 1948, State Parks Ranger Sugarman related a story which resonated with me, and has always put the discovery of gold into the context I think it fully deserves.
He was guiding a group of Japanese tourists around the park, and while talking to them, a small group broke off and went to the specific site, on the American River South Fork, where gold was first taken out by James Marshall. They stood there for awhile, quietly talking among themselves, and then, while standing there, bowed very formally towards the river. Later, he asked them why they were bowing, and they told him that they were honoring, “the place where America found her power.”
The recreational importance of the Parkway
1) Lake Natoma was rated “Best All Round Rowing Facility in North America”, by Rowing News, in its April 6, 2003 issue, noting; “As an all-around facility, Lake Natoma may be the closest North America comes to a Bled or Lucerne.”
2) The American River Bike Trail is rated #9 in the country by Trails.com who note it is: “Arguably one of the most successful and beautifully paved bike trails in northern California, this 32 mile gem of a trail stretches from downtown Sacramento eastward to Folsom Dam (64 mile round trip).”
3) “The parkway gets a million more visitors than does Yosemite National Park.” Parkway in Peril, Sacramento Bee Editorial, January 2, 2004.
The economic importance of the Parkway
1) It is an economic engine that “generates an estimated $259,034,030 in annual economic activity in the local economy.” American River Parkway: Financial Needs Study. Dangermond Group: (August 10, 2000) (Page 3)
2) The quality of life aspect of the Parkway is priceless, through recent research indicates quality of life resources provide substantial economic, social, and spiritual benefits.
The current water storage capacity is too small to adequately control the water flow and temperature, under large and periodic run-off conditions, to protect the recreational, habitat, and wildlife integrity of the Parkway.
1) The capacity of Folsom Lake is inadequate to store the water needed to provide adequate water temperature and flows for optimal recreational, habitat, and wildlife conditions during dry years, and to capture overflow during wet years.
The 500 year protection from flooding a major new dam will provide to the Sacramento community.
1) Though our mission and our perspective is Parkway centric, the construction of a major new dam on the American River will also provide substantial (500 year) flood protection, water supply, and power generation resources to the Sacramento region, of which the Parkway is the natural heart.
We feel it is important to lend our perspective to this public debate during this time of urgent investigation resulting from the recent New Orleans flooding and the New Year’s scare here in Sacramento. It is during these windows of policy opportunity that public engagement and education occur.
Our organizational research will continue, and we will specify a particular dam size, location, and design in our report on water storage and supply by September 24, 2006.
The key aspect of protecting the integrity of the Parkway is maintaining river flows and temperature in the optimal range for protection of the recreational experience and the health of the salmon. Flood condition flows of 20,000 to 35,000 (and even 115,000 cubic feet per second as in 1986 and 1997) are several times the release levels for optimal protection and result in serious degradation of the Parkway experience.
Our decision is a Parkway centric decision congruent with our mission-driven philosophy that the 5,000 acres of the Parkway comprise the most important acreage in the Sacramento region. We also understand not all agree with this priority and that is one reason the Parkway struggles financially and remains low on the funding priority list.
Our reasoning behind this decision—and our mission of “Preserve, Protect, and Strengthen the American River Parkway, Our Community’s Natural Heart”—is based, primarily, on these factors:
The historical importance of the American River and the Parkway.
1) In 1848 gold was discovered at Coloma on the American River, and this was an event of international proportion, that while clearly tragic for many, was an epic time, as H. W. Brands in his book The Age of Gold: the California Gold Rush and the New American Dream (2002) has noted:
“Yet for all its sordid side, the new American dream was an enormously creative force. It unleashed the energies of the American people, and of the many millions of foreigners who, drawn by this compelling dream, chose to become Americans. (It also unleashed the energies of those who stayed in other countries—or in some important cases, returned to other countries from America—and emulated the Argonauts of California.) It raised the American standard of living beyond anything ever achieved so broadly. It afforded the most basic freedom—freedom from want—to more people than had ever enjoyed such release. And it gave unprecedented meaning to that really revolutionary idea of Thomas Jefferson: that humans have a right to the pursuit of happiness.” (p. 443-444)
2) A personal story: Several years ago while visiting Coloma, where gold was discovered in 1948, State Parks Ranger Sugarman related a story which resonated with me, and has always put the discovery of gold into the context I think it fully deserves.
He was guiding a group of Japanese tourists around the park, and while talking to them, a small group broke off and went to the specific site, on the American River South Fork, where gold was first taken out by James Marshall. They stood there for awhile, quietly talking among themselves, and then, while standing there, bowed very formally towards the river. Later, he asked them why they were bowing, and they told him that they were honoring, “the place where America found her power.”
The recreational importance of the Parkway
1) Lake Natoma was rated “Best All Round Rowing Facility in North America”, by Rowing News, in its April 6, 2003 issue, noting; “As an all-around facility, Lake Natoma may be the closest North America comes to a Bled or Lucerne.”
2) The American River Bike Trail is rated #9 in the country by Trails.com who note it is: “Arguably one of the most successful and beautifully paved bike trails in northern California, this 32 mile gem of a trail stretches from downtown Sacramento eastward to Folsom Dam (64 mile round trip).”
3) “The parkway gets a million more visitors than does Yosemite National Park.” Parkway in Peril, Sacramento Bee Editorial, January 2, 2004.
The economic importance of the Parkway
1) It is an economic engine that “generates an estimated $259,034,030 in annual economic activity in the local economy.” American River Parkway: Financial Needs Study. Dangermond Group: (August 10, 2000) (Page 3)
2) The quality of life aspect of the Parkway is priceless, through recent research indicates quality of life resources provide substantial economic, social, and spiritual benefits.
The current water storage capacity is too small to adequately control the water flow and temperature, under large and periodic run-off conditions, to protect the recreational, habitat, and wildlife integrity of the Parkway.
1) The capacity of Folsom Lake is inadequate to store the water needed to provide adequate water temperature and flows for optimal recreational, habitat, and wildlife conditions during dry years, and to capture overflow during wet years.
The 500 year protection from flooding a major new dam will provide to the Sacramento community.
1) Though our mission and our perspective is Parkway centric, the construction of a major new dam on the American River will also provide substantial (500 year) flood protection, water supply, and power generation resources to the Sacramento region, of which the Parkway is the natural heart.
We feel it is important to lend our perspective to this public debate during this time of urgent investigation resulting from the recent New Orleans flooding and the New Year’s scare here in Sacramento. It is during these windows of policy opportunity that public engagement and education occur.
Our organizational research will continue, and we will specify a particular dam size, location, and design in our report on water storage and supply by September 24, 2006.
Tuesday, January 10, 2006
Press Release, American River Dam
For Immediate Release January 10, 2006 Sacramento, California
AMERICAN RIVER PARKWAY PRESERVATION SOCIETY ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FOR MAJOR NEW DAM ON AMERICAN RIVER
Sacramento, CA: January 10, 2006: It is time for those concerned about the American River Parkway to join with us in announcing support for the construction of a major new dam on the American River to capture and control the water, which, through flood-condition releases from Folsom Dam is devastating one of the most important parkways in the country.
In addition to the obvious benefit to the Sacramento region’s citizens from a major new dam offering 500 year—or more—flood protection, the protection of the Parkway from flooding will pay substantial recreational and habitat dividends, allowing a deeper, more stable level of year-round enjoyment.
After the evidence of New Orleans, and local flood conditions of the past few weeks, it is clear that in order to protect the Parkway’s recreational and natural assets for use by the citizens of Sacramento and provide optimal conditions for the salmon, a major new dam needs to be built somewhere on the American River.
The Parkway river flows during the first weeks of January, due to the need to release water from Folsom Lake to accommodate the expected run-offs from new storms, were running at 35,000 cubic feet per second, about ten times the optimal flow for human and salmon use.
It is only through the capture of the watershed run-off and the subsequent creation of the lake behind a new dam, that controlled flows and temperature will be available for the salmon and the year-round recreational needs of the growing population of the Sacramento region.
The Auburn Dam, planned for the North Fork of the American River, is the only proposal currently being put forth, and while there are some indications the proposed storage lake it would create needs to be larger, we will follow the congressional evaluation of that project to see if it addresses the demands imposed on the Parkway at the highest run-off levels.
Whatever comes from that evaluation, the fact remains, we need a major new dam on the American River, whether it is the Auburn Dam or some other proposal yet to emerge.
Michael Rushford, President
Deborah Baron, Executive Director
David H. Lukenbill, Senior Policy Director
American River Parkway Preservation Society (ARPPS)
AMERICAN RIVER PARKWAY PRESERVATION SOCIETY ANNOUNCES SUPPORT FOR MAJOR NEW DAM ON AMERICAN RIVER
Sacramento, CA: January 10, 2006: It is time for those concerned about the American River Parkway to join with us in announcing support for the construction of a major new dam on the American River to capture and control the water, which, through flood-condition releases from Folsom Dam is devastating one of the most important parkways in the country.
In addition to the obvious benefit to the Sacramento region’s citizens from a major new dam offering 500 year—or more—flood protection, the protection of the Parkway from flooding will pay substantial recreational and habitat dividends, allowing a deeper, more stable level of year-round enjoyment.
After the evidence of New Orleans, and local flood conditions of the past few weeks, it is clear that in order to protect the Parkway’s recreational and natural assets for use by the citizens of Sacramento and provide optimal conditions for the salmon, a major new dam needs to be built somewhere on the American River.
The Parkway river flows during the first weeks of January, due to the need to release water from Folsom Lake to accommodate the expected run-offs from new storms, were running at 35,000 cubic feet per second, about ten times the optimal flow for human and salmon use.
It is only through the capture of the watershed run-off and the subsequent creation of the lake behind a new dam, that controlled flows and temperature will be available for the salmon and the year-round recreational needs of the growing population of the Sacramento region.
The Auburn Dam, planned for the North Fork of the American River, is the only proposal currently being put forth, and while there are some indications the proposed storage lake it would create needs to be larger, we will follow the congressional evaluation of that project to see if it addresses the demands imposed on the Parkway at the highest run-off levels.
Whatever comes from that evaluation, the fact remains, we need a major new dam on the American River, whether it is the Auburn Dam or some other proposal yet to emerge.
Michael Rushford, President
Deborah Baron, Executive Director
David H. Lukenbill, Senior Policy Director
American River Parkway Preservation Society (ARPPS)
Monday, January 09, 2006
Illegal Camping on the Parkway
This story from Saturday’s Bee remind us of why the Parkway adjacent communities burdened by illegal camping of the homeless and the related crime, and consequently unable to safely use their part of the Parkway, get so frustrated by the coverage of the camping.
This story never mentions that the camping is illegal but clearly details that it is just part of the ”neighborhood”, as is the sprawling complex serving the homeless established on North 12th Street.
Here is an excerpt:
“Not far from Tracey Knickerbocker's camp, the water was rising. But Knickerbocker doesn't have a television or a radio. She doesn't read the newspaper. As a result, she says, she didn't know.
“Knickerbocker lives with her boyfriend in a tent by the American River. She says she realized the river was coming up during last week's storms only after her boyfriend got up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom. He put his foot on the ground - they sleep on a cot - and found the bottom of the tent had filled with water.
“Knickerbocker says she lost everything fleeing the river. Her bicycle. Her trailer. Her mattress. Her legal papers. Her stove. Her books. Her bags of Kool Aid.
"Everything that makes it a little bit more comfortable out here."
“Many encampments were swallowed by the rising waters. Knickerbocker, and other homeless people, say they didn't flee to higher ground because they weren't warned. Loaves & Fishes officials say they didn't warn them because they didn't realize the water was coming up.
"It just breaks my heart because this is people's neighborhoods, this is where they live, and it's all underwater," said Linda Kelly, spiritual director of the homeless services complex on 12th and North C streets.
“City officials say they called Loaves & Fishes to advise them to warn their guests. Staff members at Loaves & Fishes say they normally get contacted, but received no such warning this time.”
This story never mentions that the camping is illegal but clearly details that it is just part of the ”neighborhood”, as is the sprawling complex serving the homeless established on North 12th Street.
Here is an excerpt:
“Not far from Tracey Knickerbocker's camp, the water was rising. But Knickerbocker doesn't have a television or a radio. She doesn't read the newspaper. As a result, she says, she didn't know.
“Knickerbocker lives with her boyfriend in a tent by the American River. She says she realized the river was coming up during last week's storms only after her boyfriend got up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom. He put his foot on the ground - they sleep on a cot - and found the bottom of the tent had filled with water.
“Knickerbocker says she lost everything fleeing the river. Her bicycle. Her trailer. Her mattress. Her legal papers. Her stove. Her books. Her bags of Kool Aid.
"Everything that makes it a little bit more comfortable out here."
“Many encampments were swallowed by the rising waters. Knickerbocker, and other homeless people, say they didn't flee to higher ground because they weren't warned. Loaves & Fishes officials say they didn't warn them because they didn't realize the water was coming up.
"It just breaks my heart because this is people's neighborhoods, this is where they live, and it's all underwater," said Linda Kelly, spiritual director of the homeless services complex on 12th and North C streets.
“City officials say they called Loaves & Fishes to advise them to warn their guests. Staff members at Loaves & Fishes say they normally get contacted, but received no such warning this time.”
Friday, January 06, 2006
Sacramento Flooding, Part Thirteen
This story from today's Bee is another installment of their series, Tempting Fate, about flooding in Sacramento, and looks at the costs reported so far from the various jurisdictions around the state associated with our recent storms.
The total is about $200 million so far, with no figures from Sacramento County yet.
With the flooding on the Parkway, and the muddy water possibly indicating erosion, there could be substantial damage.
Here is an excerpt.
“Initial estimates statewide totaled more than $200 million, according to the state Office of Emergency Services. But many rain-soaked areas remained under water, and "the information is changing every day," OES spokeswoman Tina Walker said Thursday.
“In the Sacramento area, many local agencies were still compiling cost estimates Thursday.
“The totals include overtime pay for scores of fire, police, sanitation, sewage, transportation, utility and other public employees called in on a holiday weekend.
“Often working around the clock, they patrolled rivers and levees, staffed emergency operations centers, opened evacuation shelters, and filled and gave away thousands of sandbags.
“In addition, inspectors have been assessing damage to levees, roads, bridges, buildings and drainage culverts.
“Strong winds and falling trees also downed hundreds of utility poles and miles of power lines, causing blackouts for thousands of customers served by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District.
“Estimates reported to the state OES included $1.4 million in El Dorado County and about $1 million in Yolo County.
“Dan McCanta, Yolo County emergency service coordinator, said Yolo's figure was taking into account mostly just the damage to canals operated by the Yolo County Flood Control Water Conservation Agency.
"That's all we can see from the air at this point," McCanta said. "There's still more we'll be looking at on the ground when we can."
"In Placer County, damages appeared to be in the same ballpark.
"It looks like we'll have more than $1 million," spokeswoman Anita Yoder said. The estimate includes costs for cities and the unincorporated area of the county, she said.
“Figures for Sacramento County were not available Thursday, spokeswoman Megan MacPherson said."
The total is about $200 million so far, with no figures from Sacramento County yet.
With the flooding on the Parkway, and the muddy water possibly indicating erosion, there could be substantial damage.
Here is an excerpt.
“Initial estimates statewide totaled more than $200 million, according to the state Office of Emergency Services. But many rain-soaked areas remained under water, and "the information is changing every day," OES spokeswoman Tina Walker said Thursday.
“In the Sacramento area, many local agencies were still compiling cost estimates Thursday.
“The totals include overtime pay for scores of fire, police, sanitation, sewage, transportation, utility and other public employees called in on a holiday weekend.
“Often working around the clock, they patrolled rivers and levees, staffed emergency operations centers, opened evacuation shelters, and filled and gave away thousands of sandbags.
“In addition, inspectors have been assessing damage to levees, roads, bridges, buildings and drainage culverts.
“Strong winds and falling trees also downed hundreds of utility poles and miles of power lines, causing blackouts for thousands of customers served by Pacific Gas and Electric Co. and the Sacramento Municipal Utility District.
“Estimates reported to the state OES included $1.4 million in El Dorado County and about $1 million in Yolo County.
“Dan McCanta, Yolo County emergency service coordinator, said Yolo's figure was taking into account mostly just the damage to canals operated by the Yolo County Flood Control Water Conservation Agency.
"That's all we can see from the air at this point," McCanta said. "There's still more we'll be looking at on the ground when we can."
"In Placer County, damages appeared to be in the same ballpark.
"It looks like we'll have more than $1 million," spokeswoman Anita Yoder said. The estimate includes costs for cities and the unincorporated area of the county, she said.
“Figures for Sacramento County were not available Thursday, spokeswoman Megan MacPherson said."
Thursday, January 05, 2006
Parkway Flooding
This story in today’s Bee informs us of what most of us know, the Parkway is flooding and eroding farther every day the 35,000 cubic feet per second releases from the dam continue to open space in Folsom Lake, for the run-off from any new storms approaching.
Saw a bunch of wild turkeys walking around a neighborhood this morning quite a way from their home on the Parkway and who can blame them right now, it’s really muddy and fast flowing out there and not much use for humans or critters. Here are some excerpts.
“While some area residents are saddled with flooded homes and yards, many others are flocking to area waterways simply to marvel and gawk and point at all that power, now barely contained. The American River, far higher and faster than normal, has become a draw since the holiday season.
“People in slickers and galoshes have made it to the river's banks for a close-up look, talking about trees now under water, fishing spots that used to be, little islands completely submerged, all the debris floating in the now-murky water.
“Sightings of people actually in the high water are few and far between with the river rushing at approximately 35,000 cubic feet per second, though a kayaker was spotted Wednesday in Fair Oaks and a fisherman wading waist-deep in the water near the Nimbus Dam's 14 open gates had to be told by authorities to get out.
"There's no way I would be in the water now. It's just way too dangerous," said Jim Jones, a longtime local fisherman who has put his fishing gear away until the waters calm down.
… “Nearby, Bernard Hattig, 54, parked his mountain bike near the Nimbus fish hatchery ladder and looked out at the water, faster and louder - and muddier - than he's used to.
"It's pretty impressive seeing Mother Nature acting up," he said. "You can see the definite chocolate color of the water, which shows it's definitely a flood. The river is known for being so clear, so there's a lot of erosion happening."
“Michael Keck and girlfriend Lisa Nelson decided to take a lunchtime stroll to view the American River.
"Wow, it's pretty high and pretty muddy," said Keck. "It's going to take awhile to clear up."
I'll say!
Saw a bunch of wild turkeys walking around a neighborhood this morning quite a way from their home on the Parkway and who can blame them right now, it’s really muddy and fast flowing out there and not much use for humans or critters. Here are some excerpts.
“While some area residents are saddled with flooded homes and yards, many others are flocking to area waterways simply to marvel and gawk and point at all that power, now barely contained. The American River, far higher and faster than normal, has become a draw since the holiday season.
“People in slickers and galoshes have made it to the river's banks for a close-up look, talking about trees now under water, fishing spots that used to be, little islands completely submerged, all the debris floating in the now-murky water.
“Sightings of people actually in the high water are few and far between with the river rushing at approximately 35,000 cubic feet per second, though a kayaker was spotted Wednesday in Fair Oaks and a fisherman wading waist-deep in the water near the Nimbus Dam's 14 open gates had to be told by authorities to get out.
"There's no way I would be in the water now. It's just way too dangerous," said Jim Jones, a longtime local fisherman who has put his fishing gear away until the waters calm down.
… “Nearby, Bernard Hattig, 54, parked his mountain bike near the Nimbus fish hatchery ladder and looked out at the water, faster and louder - and muddier - than he's used to.
"It's pretty impressive seeing Mother Nature acting up," he said. "You can see the definite chocolate color of the water, which shows it's definitely a flood. The river is known for being so clear, so there's a lot of erosion happening."
“Michael Keck and girlfriend Lisa Nelson decided to take a lunchtime stroll to view the American River.
"Wow, it's pretty high and pretty muddy," said Keck. "It's going to take awhile to clear up."
I'll say!
Wednesday, January 04, 2006
Sacramento Flooding Part Twelve
This story, continuing the Bee’s coverage of Sacramento flooding, went from speculation to reality over the holidays and we suddenly realize, as if we needed another reminder, that we are even less prepared than before. The fact that funds were reduced for flood control after the 1997 floods is astounding.
Here is an excerpt.
"The fusillade of storms that shot through the north state finally went silent Tuesday, leaving state water officials relieved this time around, but deeply worried that they'll be stretched too thin for the monster storm that will strike one day.
"The state's flood-fighting division hasn't fully rebounded from budget cuts that stripped it of a third of its staff since the major floods of 1997.
"While it handled these storms well, "we do not have trained staff and other resources needed for a much larger event, such as 1997 and 1986," said Jay Punia, flood operations branch chief of the state Department of Water Resources.
"The department has preliminarily pegged the Dec. 31 to Jan. 2 series of storms over the American River watershed as somewhere between a 10-and 20-year storm, said Arthur Hinojosa, chief of the department's hydrology branch.
"It was not a big storm at all, and you saw what it did to our system. We handled this one OK, but there were problems all over place," he said. "It is very intimidating. We need to improve this system."
"By comparison, the storm that parked over the Russian and Napa river watersheds, causing widespread flooding in both areas, could well turn out to be a 100-year storm, one with only a 1 percent shot of striking in any given year, Hinojosa added.
"He doesn't even want to think about what a 100-year storm would do to the Central Valley.
For exhausted emergency crews, those who helplessly watched creeks rise into their homes, and those who escaped flooding, this one was rough enough.
"Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger broadened his emergency declarations Tuesday to include a total of 23 counties, and his Office of Emergency Services said damages are likely to reach at least $100 million.
"During the storms, state engineers and flood specialists responded to more than 40 calls for help with troubled levees, two dozen in the Delta where several islands and small communities were briefly evacuated."
Here is an excerpt.
"The fusillade of storms that shot through the north state finally went silent Tuesday, leaving state water officials relieved this time around, but deeply worried that they'll be stretched too thin for the monster storm that will strike one day.
"The state's flood-fighting division hasn't fully rebounded from budget cuts that stripped it of a third of its staff since the major floods of 1997.
"While it handled these storms well, "we do not have trained staff and other resources needed for a much larger event, such as 1997 and 1986," said Jay Punia, flood operations branch chief of the state Department of Water Resources.
"The department has preliminarily pegged the Dec. 31 to Jan. 2 series of storms over the American River watershed as somewhere between a 10-and 20-year storm, said Arthur Hinojosa, chief of the department's hydrology branch.
"It was not a big storm at all, and you saw what it did to our system. We handled this one OK, but there were problems all over place," he said. "It is very intimidating. We need to improve this system."
"By comparison, the storm that parked over the Russian and Napa river watersheds, causing widespread flooding in both areas, could well turn out to be a 100-year storm, one with only a 1 percent shot of striking in any given year, Hinojosa added.
"He doesn't even want to think about what a 100-year storm would do to the Central Valley.
For exhausted emergency crews, those who helplessly watched creeks rise into their homes, and those who escaped flooding, this one was rough enough.
"Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger broadened his emergency declarations Tuesday to include a total of 23 counties, and his Office of Emergency Services said damages are likely to reach at least $100 million.
"During the storms, state engineers and flood specialists responded to more than 40 calls for help with troubled levees, two dozen in the Delta where several islands and small communities were briefly evacuated."
Tuesday, January 03, 2006
What a week!
During the time away from our blog we have seen, in the most dramatic fashion, why it is crucial to control the flow from the American River Watershed at a much more effective way than we have so far.
The rising waters have pretty much submerged the Parkway and the damage will surely be high.
The dam is currently releasing water at about 32,000 cfs (cubic feet per second) which is about ten times the optimal release for the Parkway, the people, and the salmon.
What we are learning is that the flood protection standard currently used by local public leadership as adequate is not so at all.
The 100 year protection has almost broken at least three times in the last 20 years, and the 200 year protection being proclaimed as the solution, even if twice as good, still can’t give us too much of a sense of security.
We probably need to be looking at a much higher level of protection, more in line with the Dutch, who think in terms of 1,000 years.
Water storage and supply is our focus for this year and we have just begun to study it, but the events of the past ten days, in light of New Orleans, are certainly a robust way to begin our focus, and we can already draw one obvious conclusion; we need to control the water much better than we are.
Here is a related letter to the Bee, from our board president, published today:
Wondering about Auburn dam
The winter storm season is just beginning and water control officials are already warning us about the possibility of flooding. When I think about the current 32,000 cubic feet-per-second-release from Folsom Dam, I wonder if the levees can take the strain. I worry about the lives, homes and jobs that will be lost if the levees fail. I wonder if a few years from now we might wish we could have stored that water to maintain river flows for fish, wildlife and people during a drought.
I wonder about the cost Sacramento County residents are paying to install meters and the spike in our water bills during dry years. I wonder if we could be making clean, cheap electric power with the millions of gallons of water currently rushing into the ocean.
Then I wonder how many floods, droughts and brownouts Northern California must suffer before the people doing the suffering start holding city, county and state leaders responsible for wasting the last 40 years opposing and obstructing the construction of the Auburn dam.
- Michael Rushford, Carmichael
The rising waters have pretty much submerged the Parkway and the damage will surely be high.
The dam is currently releasing water at about 32,000 cfs (cubic feet per second) which is about ten times the optimal release for the Parkway, the people, and the salmon.
What we are learning is that the flood protection standard currently used by local public leadership as adequate is not so at all.
The 100 year protection has almost broken at least three times in the last 20 years, and the 200 year protection being proclaimed as the solution, even if twice as good, still can’t give us too much of a sense of security.
We probably need to be looking at a much higher level of protection, more in line with the Dutch, who think in terms of 1,000 years.
Water storage and supply is our focus for this year and we have just begun to study it, but the events of the past ten days, in light of New Orleans, are certainly a robust way to begin our focus, and we can already draw one obvious conclusion; we need to control the water much better than we are.
Here is a related letter to the Bee, from our board president, published today:
Wondering about Auburn dam
The winter storm season is just beginning and water control officials are already warning us about the possibility of flooding. When I think about the current 32,000 cubic feet-per-second-release from Folsom Dam, I wonder if the levees can take the strain. I worry about the lives, homes and jobs that will be lost if the levees fail. I wonder if a few years from now we might wish we could have stored that water to maintain river flows for fish, wildlife and people during a drought.
I wonder about the cost Sacramento County residents are paying to install meters and the spike in our water bills during dry years. I wonder if we could be making clean, cheap electric power with the millions of gallons of water currently rushing into the ocean.
Then I wonder how many floods, droughts and brownouts Northern California must suffer before the people doing the suffering start holding city, county and state leaders responsible for wasting the last 40 years opposing and obstructing the construction of the Auburn dam.
- Michael Rushford, Carmichael
Wednesday, December 21, 2005
Tuesday, December 20, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Eleven
This article continues the Bee's coverage on flooding with a focus on the finances around the levees, mostly in the Delta, which are closely connected to the Parkway and need to be seen as part of the ecosystem.
Here is an excerpt.
"If levee districts are struggling now to stay in operation, those in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta soon will struggle more.
"On July 1, the state's Delta Levee Maintenance Program will lose two-thirds of its funding.
"Known commonly as the subventions program, it provides state matching funds for maintenance and improvement projects done by Delta districts. After July 1, the program will receive a maximum of $2 million annually in state funding, compared with $6 million previously.
"The outcome is going to be that (districts) are going to stop maintaining their levees," said John Winther, president of four Delta reclamation districts.
"The Delta's 1,100-mile maze of levees is critical to protecting water quality for the 23 million Californians who use its water in their homes and businesses. Delta levees also protect two state highways, a key railroad line, several small towns and 700,000 acres of farmland - all in a marshy region between Sacramento and Tracy.
"All levees need constant maintenance, and that is especially true in the Delta, where many sit on spongy peat soil. Peat, an organic material composed of decayed plant matter, slowly compresses over time under the weight of levees.
"Without improvements, Delta levees gradually get lower in relation to sea level, allowing water to flow over them and cause levee failures.
"If we hadn't had that (subventions) program, we would have overtopped at least half the levees in the Delta either in '95, '97 or '98," said Gilbert Cosio, a partner with MBK Engineers in Sacramento, a consultant to many levee districts.
"Farming on Delta islands adds to the problem, because cultivation exposes peat soil to the air, causing it to decompose faster. Delta islands lose up to an inch of soil depth annually, and today some island interiors are more than 20 feet below sea level, leaving less mass to push back against flood waters.
"California leaders long ago recognized these problems and the broad state interests in preserving the Delta - for water supply, wildlife habitat, transportation and recreation. The Delta Levee Maintenance Program was created by legislation in 1981 to provide a way for the state to share in the Delta's upkeep."
Here is an excerpt.
"If levee districts are struggling now to stay in operation, those in the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta soon will struggle more.
"On July 1, the state's Delta Levee Maintenance Program will lose two-thirds of its funding.
"Known commonly as the subventions program, it provides state matching funds for maintenance and improvement projects done by Delta districts. After July 1, the program will receive a maximum of $2 million annually in state funding, compared with $6 million previously.
"The outcome is going to be that (districts) are going to stop maintaining their levees," said John Winther, president of four Delta reclamation districts.
"The Delta's 1,100-mile maze of levees is critical to protecting water quality for the 23 million Californians who use its water in their homes and businesses. Delta levees also protect two state highways, a key railroad line, several small towns and 700,000 acres of farmland - all in a marshy region between Sacramento and Tracy.
"All levees need constant maintenance, and that is especially true in the Delta, where many sit on spongy peat soil. Peat, an organic material composed of decayed plant matter, slowly compresses over time under the weight of levees.
"Without improvements, Delta levees gradually get lower in relation to sea level, allowing water to flow over them and cause levee failures.
"If we hadn't had that (subventions) program, we would have overtopped at least half the levees in the Delta either in '95, '97 or '98," said Gilbert Cosio, a partner with MBK Engineers in Sacramento, a consultant to many levee districts.
"Farming on Delta islands adds to the problem, because cultivation exposes peat soil to the air, causing it to decompose faster. Delta islands lose up to an inch of soil depth annually, and today some island interiors are more than 20 feet below sea level, leaving less mass to push back against flood waters.
"California leaders long ago recognized these problems and the broad state interests in preserving the Delta - for water supply, wildlife habitat, transportation and recreation. The Delta Levee Maintenance Program was created by legislation in 1981 to provide a way for the state to share in the Delta's upkeep."
Monday, December 19, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Ten
The series Tempting Fate continues today in the Bee and what today's story reminds us is how intimately the American River is connected to the vasy network of levees, and communities in the river and delta area.
Here is an excerpt, click on title for full story...
"The guardians of vital levees in California's flood-prone Central Valley are on the verge of financial crisis, an investigation by The Bee has found, one that puts basic maintenance at risk and virtually rules out upgrades for a system in decline.
"The Bee examined a year's worth of financial audits for 73 levee districts between Butte City in the north and Visalia in the south. These tiny government agencies work behind the scenes in cities and rural areas, getting a share of property taxes from landowners to maintain thousands of miles of levees.
"While state and federal agencies often help pay for major levee upgrades, local levee districts are the eyes and ears of California's flood defenses - literally the front line between us and high water.
"The Bee's analysis found that front line pocked with holes.
"Thirty-three of the districts reviewed, or nearly half, ended their most recent fiscal year in the red, with an average deficit of $133,839.
"One of the healthiest was District 341 on Sherman Island near Antioch, which is partly owned by the state and ended its 2004 budget year with a surplus of $380,325. At the low end was District 1500 near Yuba City, which ended the year in the hole by $502,010.
"The numbers reveal a stark truth: Many levee districts are chipping away at their meager assets to perform the basic maintenance that protects cities and towns from flooding.
Only a third of the districts have enough cash in reserve to cover a year's operating expenses, according to The Bee's review.
"To be very honest, we're not doing well. We don't have much money to operate," said James Waller, a board member of Reclamation District 10, which abuts the city of Marysville.
His district has an annual budget of $12,000 to maintain 23 miles of levee. Typical maintenance costs are $5,000 to $15,000 per mile of levee.
"California's levee districts were formed in the late 1800s and early 1900s by farmers to protect crops from the state's ever-meandering rivers. Nearly all still are run by farmers and they operate on a shoestring, in many cases unable to draw funds from the populated areas they now protect.
"Few districts manage to get to the larger projects that will make levees stronger, which can cost more than $1 million per mile."
Here is an excerpt, click on title for full story...
"The guardians of vital levees in California's flood-prone Central Valley are on the verge of financial crisis, an investigation by The Bee has found, one that puts basic maintenance at risk and virtually rules out upgrades for a system in decline.
"The Bee examined a year's worth of financial audits for 73 levee districts between Butte City in the north and Visalia in the south. These tiny government agencies work behind the scenes in cities and rural areas, getting a share of property taxes from landowners to maintain thousands of miles of levees.
"While state and federal agencies often help pay for major levee upgrades, local levee districts are the eyes and ears of California's flood defenses - literally the front line between us and high water.
"The Bee's analysis found that front line pocked with holes.
"Thirty-three of the districts reviewed, or nearly half, ended their most recent fiscal year in the red, with an average deficit of $133,839.
"One of the healthiest was District 341 on Sherman Island near Antioch, which is partly owned by the state and ended its 2004 budget year with a surplus of $380,325. At the low end was District 1500 near Yuba City, which ended the year in the hole by $502,010.
"The numbers reveal a stark truth: Many levee districts are chipping away at their meager assets to perform the basic maintenance that protects cities and towns from flooding.
Only a third of the districts have enough cash in reserve to cover a year's operating expenses, according to The Bee's review.
"To be very honest, we're not doing well. We don't have much money to operate," said James Waller, a board member of Reclamation District 10, which abuts the city of Marysville.
His district has an annual budget of $12,000 to maintain 23 miles of levee. Typical maintenance costs are $5,000 to $15,000 per mile of levee.
"California's levee districts were formed in the late 1800s and early 1900s by farmers to protect crops from the state's ever-meandering rivers. Nearly all still are run by farmers and they operate on a shoestring, in many cases unable to draw funds from the populated areas they now protect.
"Few districts manage to get to the larger projects that will make levees stronger, which can cost more than $1 million per mile."
Friday, December 16, 2005
Flood Control Editorial
This editorial in today's Bee shows signs of an emerging collaboration among public leadership around American River flood control involving the Folsom Dam.
We hope it continues, here's an excerpt.
"Talk about a turnaround. Six months ago, the flood control project at Folsom Dam was a near disaster when its project cost appeared to triple. Today, a new project is rapidly taking shape that could solve the problem of the dam's inability to release enough water before big rains arrive.
Part of the credit goes to the engineers who may have found a cheaper solution. But huge credit goes to an emerging team of federal and local agencies. They have learned that this flood control problem cannot be solved expeditiously without each other's help.
Big flood control projects are typically the sole domain of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A different federal agency, the Bureau of Reclamation, actually operates Folsom Dam. But the original flood fix was entirely under the corps' control.
That project was to enlarge the existing outlets on the face of the dam. The corps thought the project would cost around $200 million. But bids came in above $600 million - way beyond any federal or local budget.
Then a new engineering solution emerged. There is an emergency spillway to the side of the dam. A small cofferdam behind the dam could expose this spillway to give construction crews easy access. The idea is to construct new flood release gates."
We hope it continues, here's an excerpt.
"Talk about a turnaround. Six months ago, the flood control project at Folsom Dam was a near disaster when its project cost appeared to triple. Today, a new project is rapidly taking shape that could solve the problem of the dam's inability to release enough water before big rains arrive.
Part of the credit goes to the engineers who may have found a cheaper solution. But huge credit goes to an emerging team of federal and local agencies. They have learned that this flood control problem cannot be solved expeditiously without each other's help.
Big flood control projects are typically the sole domain of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A different federal agency, the Bureau of Reclamation, actually operates Folsom Dam. But the original flood fix was entirely under the corps' control.
That project was to enlarge the existing outlets on the face of the dam. The corps thought the project would cost around $200 million. But bids came in above $600 million - way beyond any federal or local budget.
Then a new engineering solution emerged. There is an emergency spillway to the side of the dam. A small cofferdam behind the dam could expose this spillway to give construction crews easy access. The idea is to construct new flood release gates."
Thursday, December 15, 2005
Wildlife Count on the Parkway
The annual count on the Parkway has been completed. The link goes to the full article in today's Bee, and here is an excerpt:
"Forty-six observers spotted 103 bird species and 12 mammals recently in the American River Natural History Association's 21st annual wildlife count on the American River Parkway.
By canoe and on foot, the volunteers trained their eyes on wildlife from Nimbus Dam to Discovery Park on Dec. 3.
The cool, sunny weather made for good spotting. For only the second time, a Lewis's woodpecker and a Ross's goose were seen during the count.
Previous bird totals mostly ranged between 101 and 110 species. A majority of the counters were Sacramento Audubon Society members.
Among the non-bird species, the volunteers saw 72 deer, 14 ground squirrels, 46 gray squirrels, 126 fox squirrels, five coyotes, two river otters, 10 black-tailed hares, two cottontails, two beaver, eight house cats, a striped skunk and a black rat.
The skunk and rat were firsts in the 13 years that non-bird species have been counted. Since the count was undertaken during the day, some mostly nocturnal animals such as raccoons and opossums, were absent from the list."
"Forty-six observers spotted 103 bird species and 12 mammals recently in the American River Natural History Association's 21st annual wildlife count on the American River Parkway.
By canoe and on foot, the volunteers trained their eyes on wildlife from Nimbus Dam to Discovery Park on Dec. 3.
The cool, sunny weather made for good spotting. For only the second time, a Lewis's woodpecker and a Ross's goose were seen during the count.
Previous bird totals mostly ranged between 101 and 110 species. A majority of the counters were Sacramento Audubon Society members.
Among the non-bird species, the volunteers saw 72 deer, 14 ground squirrels, 46 gray squirrels, 126 fox squirrels, five coyotes, two river otters, 10 black-tailed hares, two cottontails, two beaver, eight house cats, a striped skunk and a black rat.
The skunk and rat were firsts in the 13 years that non-bird species have been counted. Since the count was undertaken during the day, some mostly nocturnal animals such as raccoons and opossums, were absent from the list."
Wednesday, December 14, 2005
American River Salmon
A wonderful story in today’s Bee of human intervention into the ancient ritual of the salmon spawning in the American River, which not only helps overcome the loss of their ancestral run up the river, but recovers them after spawning to feed the poor and homeless.
Salmon give all for their own - and feed needy people, too
Nimbus hatchery helps species survive and is a link in distributing high-quality food.
By M.S. Enkoji -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, December 14, 2005
A tale as old as the sea plays out every year at the Nimbus Fish Hatchery, with a little modern intervention: Salmon swim and spawn, live and die - and go on to feed thousands of needy people each winter.
And fertilize a few lawns and feed a few pets as part of the bargain.
"In a sense, none of the fish is wasted," said Bob Burks, a state Department of Fish and Game manager at the hatchery.
In the final days of the spawning season, inside a cavernous building at the Hazel Avenue hatchery, a crew worked with ballet-like precision, hauling in fish, sorting them by gender, then quickly killing them.
The fresh-killed fish slid along stainless steel chutes toward the "spawner," the guy in the raincoat as orange as the glistening eggs scooped from the females. Once extracted, the eggs were fertilized.
In a natural cycle, the fish would die in a river after spawning, withering away in a watery grave. But at the hatchery, a diversion in the natural process ensures that the salmon are killed while they are still suitable for eating, Burks said. Once finished with their propagating duties, the fish, packed in ice, are trucked to a Washington fishery, processed into fillets and flash-frozen. The rest is ground into fertilizer or cat food. Unused eggs are sold for bait.
As much as 125,000 pounds of salmon from six Northern California hatcheries is distributed throughout Northern California every holiday season to charities such as Loaves & Fishes in Sacramento and to 40 Indian tribes.
Salmon give all for their own - and feed needy people, too
Nimbus hatchery helps species survive and is a link in distributing high-quality food.
By M.S. Enkoji -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, December 14, 2005
A tale as old as the sea plays out every year at the Nimbus Fish Hatchery, with a little modern intervention: Salmon swim and spawn, live and die - and go on to feed thousands of needy people each winter.
And fertilize a few lawns and feed a few pets as part of the bargain.
"In a sense, none of the fish is wasted," said Bob Burks, a state Department of Fish and Game manager at the hatchery.
In the final days of the spawning season, inside a cavernous building at the Hazel Avenue hatchery, a crew worked with ballet-like precision, hauling in fish, sorting them by gender, then quickly killing them.
The fresh-killed fish slid along stainless steel chutes toward the "spawner," the guy in the raincoat as orange as the glistening eggs scooped from the females. Once extracted, the eggs were fertilized.
In a natural cycle, the fish would die in a river after spawning, withering away in a watery grave. But at the hatchery, a diversion in the natural process ensures that the salmon are killed while they are still suitable for eating, Burks said. Once finished with their propagating duties, the fish, packed in ice, are trucked to a Washington fishery, processed into fillets and flash-frozen. The rest is ground into fertilizer or cat food. Unused eggs are sold for bait.
As much as 125,000 pounds of salmon from six Northern California hatcheries is distributed throughout Northern California every holiday season to charities such as Loaves & Fishes in Sacramento and to 40 Indian tribes.
Tuesday, December 13, 2005
Lower Reach Report, Homeless Follow Up Part Three
Sacramento public leadership has proposed a housing first model to deal with the chronic homeless, those are the folks who inhabit the illegal campgrounds along the Parkway in the Lower Reach, and it is a model we agree with, as we outlined in our Lower Reach Report on our website.
However, the details are important and the model we agree with is the Pathways to Housing model, which places people in individual apartments scattered throughout the community and provides treatment in that personalized setting.
The model that appears to be what Sacramento advocates are proposing (details are still sketchy) is to continue the type of concentration of services already blighting a large part of the downtown area and provide housing in the same manner.
Here is a recent San Francisco Chronicle article about the Pathways to Housing model from Pathway’s website.
Success in the Big Apple
New York City finds path for mentally ill Housing homeless before treatment bucks conventional wisdom
Kevin Fagan, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, June 14, 2004
New York - -- Shopping for telephones is what finally drove it home to Tony Bartol that he was re-entering that almost-forgotten world where the sidewalk was not his bed. He stood in front of a wall lined with 200 of them in plastic packaging -- white phones with speakers, black ones with six lines, red ones with voice mail -- and scratched his head, confused.
"I have no idea what to pick here," he said. His hand trembled as he touched one, then another. "The last time I owned a phone was 1977."
A few weeks before, Bartol was sleeping in Manhattan subway stations, so mentally ill he could barely pluck reality from the visions of God in his head. He'd been that way for 19 years. On this day in mid-May, the 54-year-old, bushy-bearded string bean of a man was in a department store with two social workers shopping for a few essentials before moving into his own apartment.
He was still delusional, still without a job, and still not on the medication he needed to address his psychosis. But now, he had one angel over his street-tough shoulder that other mentally ill homeless people still foraging in alleyways didn't -- a program called Pathways to Housing, a New York-minted twist on the "supportive housing" model of tackling chronic homelessness in urban America.
Unlike other cutting-edge supportive housing techniques in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago -- and being embraced in San Francisco -- in which the hard-core homeless are moved en masse into residential hotels with on-site social services, Pathways to Housing snatches them straight off the street and gives them their own, individual apartments apart from other homeless people, alongside average New Yorkers. And unlike virtually any other program in the country, it does this with the hardest core population of them all: the mentally ill.
For the rest of the story: http://www.pathwaystohousing.org/news/SFC_6-14-04.html
However, the details are important and the model we agree with is the Pathways to Housing model, which places people in individual apartments scattered throughout the community and provides treatment in that personalized setting.
The model that appears to be what Sacramento advocates are proposing (details are still sketchy) is to continue the type of concentration of services already blighting a large part of the downtown area and provide housing in the same manner.
Here is a recent San Francisco Chronicle article about the Pathways to Housing model from Pathway’s website.
Success in the Big Apple
New York City finds path for mentally ill Housing homeless before treatment bucks conventional wisdom
Kevin Fagan, Chronicle Staff Writer
Monday, June 14, 2004
New York - -- Shopping for telephones is what finally drove it home to Tony Bartol that he was re-entering that almost-forgotten world where the sidewalk was not his bed. He stood in front of a wall lined with 200 of them in plastic packaging -- white phones with speakers, black ones with six lines, red ones with voice mail -- and scratched his head, confused.
"I have no idea what to pick here," he said. His hand trembled as he touched one, then another. "The last time I owned a phone was 1977."
A few weeks before, Bartol was sleeping in Manhattan subway stations, so mentally ill he could barely pluck reality from the visions of God in his head. He'd been that way for 19 years. On this day in mid-May, the 54-year-old, bushy-bearded string bean of a man was in a department store with two social workers shopping for a few essentials before moving into his own apartment.
He was still delusional, still without a job, and still not on the medication he needed to address his psychosis. But now, he had one angel over his street-tough shoulder that other mentally ill homeless people still foraging in alleyways didn't -- a program called Pathways to Housing, a New York-minted twist on the "supportive housing" model of tackling chronic homelessness in urban America.
Unlike other cutting-edge supportive housing techniques in New York, Philadelphia, Chicago -- and being embraced in San Francisco -- in which the hard-core homeless are moved en masse into residential hotels with on-site social services, Pathways to Housing snatches them straight off the street and gives them their own, individual apartments apart from other homeless people, alongside average New Yorkers. And unlike virtually any other program in the country, it does this with the hardest core population of them all: the mentally ill.
For the rest of the story: http://www.pathwaystohousing.org/news/SFC_6-14-04.html
Monday, December 12, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Nine
What is revealing about this report in yesterday’s Bee is that it takes 80 foot deep slurry walls (sunken alongside the levee as protection barriers) to ensure against levee seepage, and many of the most populous areas do not have anywhere near that deep protection.
As tragic the floods in New Orleans were and continue to cause great hardship there, it has garnered well-deserved local attention as we are the least protected from flooding of any major metropolitan area in the United States.
Seepage threatening area levees
Experts drill next to earthen walls to pinpoint problems.
By Deb Kollars -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Sunday, December 11, 2005
Investigators studying the New Orleans flooding disaster have identified underground water seepage as a key reason certain levees collapsed during Hurricane Katrina.
A mostly invisible problem until it is too late, deep water seepage also is an urgent concern in Sacramento and throughout the Central Valley.
For years, flood control experts have had their hands full designing and maintaining above-ground levees that contain the rivers flowing across the landscape.
But now, they also are trying to get a grip on unseen waters traveling silently beneath those levees.
The Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency recently concluded a massive drilling project along levees in Natomas, involving 110 deep drilling sites, to determine the depth and extent of seepage there.
In Yolo County, flood control officials in West Sacramento are evaluating similar geotechnical data already on the books, and are planning more investigative drilling next spring.
At the same time, the state has identified underground seepage as a major concern across the Central Valley, and is working on a plan for evaluating the layers of ground and the water flows beneath levees.
In New Orleans, preliminary reviews have found that such underground flows undermined certain levees and caused them to crumble after Hurricane Katrina hit. The seepage occurred below walls of sheet pilings that had been driven 10 feet into the earthen levees, far shallower than what engineers now say is necessary to protect the city.
Les Harder, California's acting deputy director for public safety for the Department of Water Resources, was part of a National Science Foundation team that investigated the New Orleans flooding disaster. He came home shaking his head - both at the losses in the South and at the potential for losses in California.
"Do we have those cases here? You bet," Harder said of the underground seepage threat. "Have we had past failures because of it? Absolutely."
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13967210p-14801298c.html
As tragic the floods in New Orleans were and continue to cause great hardship there, it has garnered well-deserved local attention as we are the least protected from flooding of any major metropolitan area in the United States.
Seepage threatening area levees
Experts drill next to earthen walls to pinpoint problems.
By Deb Kollars -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Sunday, December 11, 2005
Investigators studying the New Orleans flooding disaster have identified underground water seepage as a key reason certain levees collapsed during Hurricane Katrina.
A mostly invisible problem until it is too late, deep water seepage also is an urgent concern in Sacramento and throughout the Central Valley.
For years, flood control experts have had their hands full designing and maintaining above-ground levees that contain the rivers flowing across the landscape.
But now, they also are trying to get a grip on unseen waters traveling silently beneath those levees.
The Sacramento Area Flood Control Agency recently concluded a massive drilling project along levees in Natomas, involving 110 deep drilling sites, to determine the depth and extent of seepage there.
In Yolo County, flood control officials in West Sacramento are evaluating similar geotechnical data already on the books, and are planning more investigative drilling next spring.
At the same time, the state has identified underground seepage as a major concern across the Central Valley, and is working on a plan for evaluating the layers of ground and the water flows beneath levees.
In New Orleans, preliminary reviews have found that such underground flows undermined certain levees and caused them to crumble after Hurricane Katrina hit. The seepage occurred below walls of sheet pilings that had been driven 10 feet into the earthen levees, far shallower than what engineers now say is necessary to protect the city.
Les Harder, California's acting deputy director for public safety for the Department of Water Resources, was part of a National Science Foundation team that investigated the New Orleans flooding disaster. He came home shaking his head - both at the losses in the South and at the potential for losses in California.
"Do we have those cases here? You bet," Harder said of the underground seepage threat. "Have we had past failures because of it? Absolutely."
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13967210p-14801298c.html
Friday, December 09, 2005
Sprawl & Smart Growth
This post is an article about sprawl and current thinking about it, which is playing a large role in the preservation of the Parkway.
In addition to this article, there is also a book out recently, Sprawl, by Robert Bruegmann, professor of urban planning at the University of Chicago, which makes a good case that sprawl isn’t the enemy most commentators would have us believe.
Here is an excerpt: “Detractors call it sprawl and assert that it is economically inefficient, socially inequitable, environmentally irresponsible and ugly. Robert Bruegmann calls it a logical consequence of economic growth and the democratization of society, with benefits that urban planners have failed to recognize.
In his incisive history of the expanded city, Bruegmann overturns every assumption we have about sprawl. Taking a long view of urban development, he demonstrates that sprawl is neither recent or particularly American but as old as cities themselves, just as characteristic of ancient Rome and eighteenth-century Paris as it is of Atlanta or Los Angeles. Nor is sprawl the disaster claimed by many contemporary observers. Although sprawl, like any settlement pattern, has undoubtedly produced problems that must be addressed, it has also provided millions of people with the kinds of mobility, privacy, and choice that were once the exclusive prerogatives of the rich and powerful.”
One of the facts noted in this article, confirming Bruegmann, is that the cities touted as smart growth models are cities that are also driving out their children and consequently moving away from smart growth policies, cities like Portland, Oregon.
Rocky Mountain News: July 9, 2005
Smart Growth & Sprawl-reducing policies suffer setbacks around the country
By C. Kenneth Orski and Jane C Shaw
"Smart-growth" policies, which became popular nationwide during the 1990s, are regulations designed to reduce suburban sprawl and control growth. They encourage people to live close together within walking distance of shops and offices. One goal is to reduce the use of the automobile. Another is to create neighborhoods full of interesting "streetscapes." A third is to cluster people in high densities in order to preserve large areas of open space. Today, smart-growth policies seem to be in retreat. Setbacks have occurred in Maryland, Virginia and Oregon, and new census information suggests that the public does not really embrace the smart growth way of life.
Maryland: No dent in land-use patterns
One sign of smart growth's weakness comes from Maryland, where former Gov. Paris N. Glendening unveiled a statewide policy in 1997 to manage growth. The idea was to restrict the use of public funds for development to areas where public infrastructure was already being supplied. Counties were to submit plans to the state showing where they wanted growth to occur. These "priority funding areas" would be eligible for state infrastructure financial assistance, but projects outside these areas would not. The policy was hailed as a milestone. But as Peter Whoriskey reported last fall in a series of articles in the Washington Post, Glendening's initiative has yet to make a significant dent in Maryland's sprawling land-use patterns.
"A review of key state and local planning records shows no significant shifts in Maryland's development patterns since the passage of Glendening's smart growth package," wrote Whoriskey. "Growth still takes place where there was nothing, rather than where it has gone before."
Although he did not have recent figures, Whoriskey noted that in 2001, 75 percent of the land consumed by home building in Maryland was taken from pastures, woods and other parcels outside the smart-growth areas - almost the same percentage as before the program began, according to Maryland Department of Planning records. One possible reason for the failure of Glendening's smart-growth policy was that it lacked teeth. The state could refuse to fund the necessary public infrastructure but could not veto a project. Large developers and retail giants such as Wal-Mart built anyway, financing the necessary roads and sewers themselves. Local officials refused to stand in the way.
For the rest of the article: http://www.perc.org/perc.php?id=575
In addition to this article, there is also a book out recently, Sprawl, by Robert Bruegmann, professor of urban planning at the University of Chicago, which makes a good case that sprawl isn’t the enemy most commentators would have us believe.
Here is an excerpt: “Detractors call it sprawl and assert that it is economically inefficient, socially inequitable, environmentally irresponsible and ugly. Robert Bruegmann calls it a logical consequence of economic growth and the democratization of society, with benefits that urban planners have failed to recognize.
In his incisive history of the expanded city, Bruegmann overturns every assumption we have about sprawl. Taking a long view of urban development, he demonstrates that sprawl is neither recent or particularly American but as old as cities themselves, just as characteristic of ancient Rome and eighteenth-century Paris as it is of Atlanta or Los Angeles. Nor is sprawl the disaster claimed by many contemporary observers. Although sprawl, like any settlement pattern, has undoubtedly produced problems that must be addressed, it has also provided millions of people with the kinds of mobility, privacy, and choice that were once the exclusive prerogatives of the rich and powerful.”
One of the facts noted in this article, confirming Bruegmann, is that the cities touted as smart growth models are cities that are also driving out their children and consequently moving away from smart growth policies, cities like Portland, Oregon.
Rocky Mountain News: July 9, 2005
Smart Growth & Sprawl-reducing policies suffer setbacks around the country
By C. Kenneth Orski and Jane C Shaw
"Smart-growth" policies, which became popular nationwide during the 1990s, are regulations designed to reduce suburban sprawl and control growth. They encourage people to live close together within walking distance of shops and offices. One goal is to reduce the use of the automobile. Another is to create neighborhoods full of interesting "streetscapes." A third is to cluster people in high densities in order to preserve large areas of open space. Today, smart-growth policies seem to be in retreat. Setbacks have occurred in Maryland, Virginia and Oregon, and new census information suggests that the public does not really embrace the smart growth way of life.
Maryland: No dent in land-use patterns
One sign of smart growth's weakness comes from Maryland, where former Gov. Paris N. Glendening unveiled a statewide policy in 1997 to manage growth. The idea was to restrict the use of public funds for development to areas where public infrastructure was already being supplied. Counties were to submit plans to the state showing where they wanted growth to occur. These "priority funding areas" would be eligible for state infrastructure financial assistance, but projects outside these areas would not. The policy was hailed as a milestone. But as Peter Whoriskey reported last fall in a series of articles in the Washington Post, Glendening's initiative has yet to make a significant dent in Maryland's sprawling land-use patterns.
"A review of key state and local planning records shows no significant shifts in Maryland's development patterns since the passage of Glendening's smart growth package," wrote Whoriskey. "Growth still takes place where there was nothing, rather than where it has gone before."
Although he did not have recent figures, Whoriskey noted that in 2001, 75 percent of the land consumed by home building in Maryland was taken from pastures, woods and other parcels outside the smart-growth areas - almost the same percentage as before the program began, according to Maryland Department of Planning records. One possible reason for the failure of Glendening's smart-growth policy was that it lacked teeth. The state could refuse to fund the necessary public infrastructure but could not veto a project. Large developers and retail giants such as Wal-Mart built anyway, financing the necessary roads and sewers themselves. Local officials refused to stand in the way.
For the rest of the article: http://www.perc.org/perc.php?id=575
Thursday, December 08, 2005
Lower Reach Report, Homeless Follow Up, Part Two
We hope that the ban on shopping carts this article (click on post title for complete article, excerpt below) in today's Bee discusses, is approved by the county.
The communities adjacent to the Lower Reach (Discovery Park, Woodlake and Cal Expo) of the Parkway, have been struggling for years with the trash of illegal campers, largely being hauled in by stolen shopping carts.
County may ban carts in parkway
Some say it's needed for safety; others fault lack of housing for the homeless.
By Bill Lindelof -- Bee Staff WriterPublished 2:15 am PST Thursday, December 8, 2005
County officials and bicycle advocates say banning shopping carts on the American River Parkway will prevent accidents and cut down on trash.
But advocates for the homeless say the answer is affordable housing - not more enforcement.
"It's putting the cart before the house," said Tim Brown, executive director of Loaves & Fishes, which offers free meals to homeless people at its North C Street complex near the parkway.
County officials paint a sobering picture of trash left in the riparian parkway by the homeless - a good deal of it carried in using shopping carts. In 2004, county parks workers hauled about 40 tons of trash from unlawful campsites.
And bike advocates say that homeless people dangerously crowd the paved trail with carts. Lea Brooks, president of Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, said carts are slow, often pushed two abreast and are difficult to see in early morning or evening light.
Brooks told of several incidents involving homeless people and their shopping carts impeding bicyclists, including one particularly odd incident:
"One morning last winter, an illegal camper was sleeping in a cart in the middle of the bike trail," Brooks said. "It was dark and foggy near the Howe Avenue Bridge."
The bicycling Brooks could barely see the sleeping man and his cart blocking the bike trail.
Many homeless people are mentally ill and need help, she said. For their own health, it does not make sense to allow them to camp on the bike trail, she said.
Brooks said banning carts, along with the prohibition against camping, might trigger a desire in homeless campers to obtain help.
The County Recreation and Park Commission approved the cart ban by a 4-0 vote Nov. 17. It was scheduled to go before the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.
The communities adjacent to the Lower Reach (Discovery Park, Woodlake and Cal Expo) of the Parkway, have been struggling for years with the trash of illegal campers, largely being hauled in by stolen shopping carts.
County may ban carts in parkway
Some say it's needed for safety; others fault lack of housing for the homeless.
By Bill Lindelof -- Bee Staff WriterPublished 2:15 am PST Thursday, December 8, 2005
County officials and bicycle advocates say banning shopping carts on the American River Parkway will prevent accidents and cut down on trash.
But advocates for the homeless say the answer is affordable housing - not more enforcement.
"It's putting the cart before the house," said Tim Brown, executive director of Loaves & Fishes, which offers free meals to homeless people at its North C Street complex near the parkway.
County officials paint a sobering picture of trash left in the riparian parkway by the homeless - a good deal of it carried in using shopping carts. In 2004, county parks workers hauled about 40 tons of trash from unlawful campsites.
And bike advocates say that homeless people dangerously crowd the paved trail with carts. Lea Brooks, president of Sacramento Area Bicycle Advocates, said carts are slow, often pushed two abreast and are difficult to see in early morning or evening light.
Brooks told of several incidents involving homeless people and their shopping carts impeding bicyclists, including one particularly odd incident:
"One morning last winter, an illegal camper was sleeping in a cart in the middle of the bike trail," Brooks said. "It was dark and foggy near the Howe Avenue Bridge."
The bicycling Brooks could barely see the sleeping man and his cart blocking the bike trail.
Many homeless people are mentally ill and need help, she said. For their own health, it does not make sense to allow them to camp on the bike trail, she said.
Brooks said banning carts, along with the prohibition against camping, might trigger a desire in homeless campers to obtain help.
The County Recreation and Park Commission approved the cart ban by a 4-0 vote Nov. 17. It was scheduled to go before the Board of Supervisors on Tuesday.
Wednesday, December 07, 2005
Lower Reach Report, Homeless Follow Up
The article in today’s Bee about the homeless plan reaches the same conclusion that we reached in our Lower Reach Report, posted on our website, that the chronic homeless, those who have been camping illegally along the Parkway for years, need to be placed in housing before they can begin to deal with their other issues.
The approach we like, which we hope to see implemented here, is the one New York based, Pathways to Housing, has had an 85% success rate with, and includes a treatment team approach that addresses the mental, drug addiction and other issues directly.
The Bee also published our letter to the editor today about the Sacramento Zoo we posted on a few days ago.
Homeless plan supported
City, county officials back strategy, await details
By Judy Lin -- Bee Staff WriterPublished 2:15 am PST Wednesday, December 7, 2005
Calling it a moral imperative, Sacramento city and county elected officials wasted no time Tuesday in endorsing a 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness but left tough funding decisions to be worked out later.
"I see a lot of risk and cost, and yet, on the other hand, a lot of promise," said Sacramento City Councilman Ray Tretheway.
The plan is premised on a "housing first" approach that is showing success elsewhere in the country. The idea is that the best way to help the homeless is to find them shelter, and then they may be more receptive to using various programs designed to make them more self-sufficient.
Local elected officials got their first in-depth look Tuesday at the draft of the 10-year plan that is aimed at the estimated 1,600 chronically homeless people in the county. The plan defines this group as those who have been homeless for more than a year or who have been homeless at least four times in a three-year period.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13949556p-14784238c.html
The approach we like, which we hope to see implemented here, is the one New York based, Pathways to Housing, has had an 85% success rate with, and includes a treatment team approach that addresses the mental, drug addiction and other issues directly.
The Bee also published our letter to the editor today about the Sacramento Zoo we posted on a few days ago.
Homeless plan supported
City, county officials back strategy, await details
By Judy Lin -- Bee Staff WriterPublished 2:15 am PST Wednesday, December 7, 2005
Calling it a moral imperative, Sacramento city and county elected officials wasted no time Tuesday in endorsing a 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness but left tough funding decisions to be worked out later.
"I see a lot of risk and cost, and yet, on the other hand, a lot of promise," said Sacramento City Councilman Ray Tretheway.
The plan is premised on a "housing first" approach that is showing success elsewhere in the country. The idea is that the best way to help the homeless is to find them shelter, and then they may be more receptive to using various programs designed to make them more self-sufficient.
Local elected officials got their first in-depth look Tuesday at the draft of the 10-year plan that is aimed at the estimated 1,600 chronically homeless people in the county. The plan defines this group as those who have been homeless for more than a year or who have been homeless at least four times in a three-year period.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13949556p-14784238c.html
Tuesday, December 06, 2005
God and the Environment, Part Two
One of the most beautiful and balanced expressions of the vital importance a river and its watershed can have in the history and life of the people who live within it, is the 2001 Catholic Bishop’s Pastoral Letter on the Columbia River Watershed.
This project has had deep significance for our work around the American River Parkway and the watershed birthing it.
I have excerpted the introduction and the completed document can be read at http://www.columbiariver.org/index1.html
The Columbia River Watershed:
Caring for Creation and the Common Good
An International Pastoral Letter by the Catholic Bishops of the Region
“God saw all that had been made, and indeed it was very good.” (Genesis 1:31)
“We cannot interfere in one area of the ecosystem without paying due attention both to the consequences of such interference in other areas and to the well-being of future generations … delicate ecological balances are upset by the uncontrolled destruction of animal and plant life or by a reckless exploitation of natural resources. It should be pointed out that all of this, even if carried out in the name of progress and well-being, is ultimately to humankind's disadvantage.... An education in ecological responsibility is urgent: responsibility for oneself, for others, and for the earth.”
--Pope John Paul II, The Ecological Crisis: A Common Responsibility, 1990
“We must expand our understanding of the moral responsibility of citizens to serve the common good…”
--The Catholic Bishops of the United States, Economic Justice for All, 1986
“The fundamental relation between humanity and nature is one of caring for creation.”
--The Catholic Bishops of the United States, Renewing the Earth, 1991
“We need to reexamine the ways we think and act, to affirm and support what we are presently doing that is environmentally responsible and to critique and challenge what is irresponsible and unsustainable.”
--The Catholic Bishops of Alberta, Canada, Celebrate Life: Care for Creation, 1998
(c) 2000 Columbia River Pastoral Letter Project. Permission is granted to quote from this document, with appropriate attribution, for journalistic, educational, or discussion purposes.
Caring for Creation, Community and the Columbia
The Columbia River Watershed stands as one of the most beautiful places on God's earth. Its mountains and valleys, forests and meadows, rivers and plains reflect the presence of their Creator. Its farms and fishing boats, rural communities and cities, railroads, ports and industries reveal the varied ways in which peoples of the region have worked with earth's beauty and bounty to derive their livelihood from the land and water.
The core of the 259,000 square miles of the Columbia Watershed is the 1,200 miles of the great river known as the Columbia. It begins in British Columbia in Canada, is fed in the U.S. by tributaries in Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon, and flows to the Pacific Ocean. This magnificent network of rivers -- the region's lifeblood -- is an extensive ecosystem that transcends national, state and provincial borders.
We, the Catholic bishops in the international watershed region of the United States and Canada, write this pastoral letter because we have become concerned about regional economic and ecological conditions and the conflicts over them in the watershed. We address this letter to our Catholic community and to all people of good will. We hope that we might work together to develop and implement an integrated spiritual, social and ecological vision for our watershed home, a vision that promotes justice for people and stewardship of creation.
We recognize the great contributions that our ancestors made to this region. The original native inhabitants and the early ranchers, farmers, fishers and loggers struggled against almost insurmountable odds to carve out a home in this sometimes inhospitable land. We recognize that damage to the watershed may have been caused by financial need and lack of knowledge more than by a lack of appreciation for the environment.
Our pastoral letter is not meant to criticize people's efforts to provide a suitable living for their family. We are hopeful that those involved in industry are, by and large, also concerned about the environment.
At the same time, we commend those who have recognized and responded to the environmental challenges that result from commercial and industrial enterprises. It is important for those with deeper concerns about the environment to recognize that farmers, ranchers and other landowners and workers are not their enemies. It is equally important that the latter groups seek to better understand environmental concerns. Protection of the land is a common cause promoted more effectively through active cooperation than through contentious wrangling.
We call for a thorough, humble and introspective evaluation that seeks to eliminate both economic greed that fails to respect the environment, and ecological elitism that lacks a proper regard for the legitimate rights and property of others.
The Columbia River Watershed: Caring for Creation and the Common Good focuses particularly on our common responsibilities for our region. In this pastoral letter we will explore biblical and Catholic Church teachings about stewardship; the need to respect nature; and the need to recognize and promote the common good. These themes are consistent with a Christian belief that the earth is a creation of God intended to serve the needs of all creation.
This project has had deep significance for our work around the American River Parkway and the watershed birthing it.
I have excerpted the introduction and the completed document can be read at http://www.columbiariver.org/index1.html
The Columbia River Watershed:
Caring for Creation and the Common Good
An International Pastoral Letter by the Catholic Bishops of the Region
“God saw all that had been made, and indeed it was very good.” (Genesis 1:31)
“We cannot interfere in one area of the ecosystem without paying due attention both to the consequences of such interference in other areas and to the well-being of future generations … delicate ecological balances are upset by the uncontrolled destruction of animal and plant life or by a reckless exploitation of natural resources. It should be pointed out that all of this, even if carried out in the name of progress and well-being, is ultimately to humankind's disadvantage.... An education in ecological responsibility is urgent: responsibility for oneself, for others, and for the earth.”
--Pope John Paul II, The Ecological Crisis: A Common Responsibility, 1990
“We must expand our understanding of the moral responsibility of citizens to serve the common good…”
--The Catholic Bishops of the United States, Economic Justice for All, 1986
“The fundamental relation between humanity and nature is one of caring for creation.”
--The Catholic Bishops of the United States, Renewing the Earth, 1991
“We need to reexamine the ways we think and act, to affirm and support what we are presently doing that is environmentally responsible and to critique and challenge what is irresponsible and unsustainable.”
--The Catholic Bishops of Alberta, Canada, Celebrate Life: Care for Creation, 1998
(c) 2000 Columbia River Pastoral Letter Project. Permission is granted to quote from this document, with appropriate attribution, for journalistic, educational, or discussion purposes.
Caring for Creation, Community and the Columbia
The Columbia River Watershed stands as one of the most beautiful places on God's earth. Its mountains and valleys, forests and meadows, rivers and plains reflect the presence of their Creator. Its farms and fishing boats, rural communities and cities, railroads, ports and industries reveal the varied ways in which peoples of the region have worked with earth's beauty and bounty to derive their livelihood from the land and water.
The core of the 259,000 square miles of the Columbia Watershed is the 1,200 miles of the great river known as the Columbia. It begins in British Columbia in Canada, is fed in the U.S. by tributaries in Montana, Idaho, Washington and Oregon, and flows to the Pacific Ocean. This magnificent network of rivers -- the region's lifeblood -- is an extensive ecosystem that transcends national, state and provincial borders.
We, the Catholic bishops in the international watershed region of the United States and Canada, write this pastoral letter because we have become concerned about regional economic and ecological conditions and the conflicts over them in the watershed. We address this letter to our Catholic community and to all people of good will. We hope that we might work together to develop and implement an integrated spiritual, social and ecological vision for our watershed home, a vision that promotes justice for people and stewardship of creation.
We recognize the great contributions that our ancestors made to this region. The original native inhabitants and the early ranchers, farmers, fishers and loggers struggled against almost insurmountable odds to carve out a home in this sometimes inhospitable land. We recognize that damage to the watershed may have been caused by financial need and lack of knowledge more than by a lack of appreciation for the environment.
Our pastoral letter is not meant to criticize people's efforts to provide a suitable living for their family. We are hopeful that those involved in industry are, by and large, also concerned about the environment.
At the same time, we commend those who have recognized and responded to the environmental challenges that result from commercial and industrial enterprises. It is important for those with deeper concerns about the environment to recognize that farmers, ranchers and other landowners and workers are not their enemies. It is equally important that the latter groups seek to better understand environmental concerns. Protection of the land is a common cause promoted more effectively through active cooperation than through contentious wrangling.
We call for a thorough, humble and introspective evaluation that seeks to eliminate both economic greed that fails to respect the environment, and ecological elitism that lacks a proper regard for the legitimate rights and property of others.
The Columbia River Watershed: Caring for Creation and the Common Good focuses particularly on our common responsibilities for our region. In this pastoral letter we will explore biblical and Catholic Church teachings about stewardship; the need to respect nature; and the need to recognize and promote the common good. These themes are consistent with a Christian belief that the earth is a creation of God intended to serve the needs of all creation.
Monday, December 05, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Eight
The Bee, in an editorial Saturday, highlighted the absurdity of the reasoning keeping vital flood scenario maps relatively unavailable to the public, and in so doing reminds us of why we need to pay attention to the local follow up of the increased scrutiny around flooding issues since New Orleans.
The Bee has also done a valuable public service by posting the map information and we applaud that but question why the Bee needs to do the job public administrators are hired, and paid quite well, (recent research by the Employee Benefits Research Institute shows that public employees now make 46% more in average wages and benefits than private sector employees) to do.
We’ll continue to track this entire flood/water supply/water storage issue, as it has huge implications for the long-term preservation, protection, and strengthening of the Parkway.
Editorial: Flood planning for all
Why does the city keep maps under wraps?
Published 2:15 am PST Saturday, December 3, 2005
Sacramento is ahead of many Central Valley communities in mapping for flood disaster. The city and county have prepared 18 maps that depict how deep - and how fast - the water would flow in various neighborhoods, if and when levees break.
This cartography, while grim, is a vital tool for emergency planners. It is also helpful for everyone in the flood plain. More than any official pronouncement, these maps hammer home the imperative for residents and business owners to plan for disaster and evacuate early.
Given their impact, you might expect these maps to be easily accessible to residents. Sadly, they are not. City and county officials have been displaying some maps at recent meetings, but have declined for years to put some or all of them on their respective Web sites.
Why? One official excuse is that digital versions of the maps are too large for people to easily download them. Another recent claim is that residents might use the maps to make predetermined - and possibly foolhardy - decisions about where they should evacuate. Neither excuse stands up to scrutiny.
For the rest of the editorial: http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/13931668p-14768448c.html
The Bee has also done a valuable public service by posting the map information and we applaud that but question why the Bee needs to do the job public administrators are hired, and paid quite well, (recent research by the Employee Benefits Research Institute shows that public employees now make 46% more in average wages and benefits than private sector employees) to do.
We’ll continue to track this entire flood/water supply/water storage issue, as it has huge implications for the long-term preservation, protection, and strengthening of the Parkway.
Editorial: Flood planning for all
Why does the city keep maps under wraps?
Published 2:15 am PST Saturday, December 3, 2005
Sacramento is ahead of many Central Valley communities in mapping for flood disaster. The city and county have prepared 18 maps that depict how deep - and how fast - the water would flow in various neighborhoods, if and when levees break.
This cartography, while grim, is a vital tool for emergency planners. It is also helpful for everyone in the flood plain. More than any official pronouncement, these maps hammer home the imperative for residents and business owners to plan for disaster and evacuate early.
Given their impact, you might expect these maps to be easily accessible to residents. Sadly, they are not. City and county officials have been displaying some maps at recent meetings, but have declined for years to put some or all of them on their respective Web sites.
Why? One official excuse is that digital versions of the maps are too large for people to easily download them. Another recent claim is that residents might use the maps to make predetermined - and possibly foolhardy - decisions about where they should evacuate. Neither excuse stands up to scrutiny.
For the rest of the editorial: http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/13931668p-14768448c.html
Friday, December 02, 2005
God and the Environment
This article, God and Man in the Environmental Debate, (click on post title, excerpt below) from the Acton Institute, points out the folly in keeping a large part of the community, those who are religious, from any public debate about the protection of natural resources.
The tragic consequences, whether it is the premature banning of DDT and the resulting resurgence of mosquito borne diseases, or the protection of animals at the expense of human being's health and welfare, starkly remind us that all voices need to be raised in the public square.
God and Man in the Environmental Debate
by Jay W. Richards, Director of Institutional Relations
I recently received a letter from a leading botanist at a prominent scientific institution. The letter was mostly agreeable and even complimentary. But near the end, when humanity became the subject, its tone darkened. The scientist said he disagreed with me that human beings were part of the plan, as it were. On the contrary, he complained about “the devastation humans are currently imposing upon our planet”:
"Still, adding over seventy million new humans to the planet each year, the future looks pretty bleak to me. Surely, the Black Death was one of the best things that ever happened to Europe: elevating the worth of human labor, reducing environmental degradation, and, rather promptly, producing the Renaissance. From where I sit, Planet Earth could use another major human pandemic, and pronto!"
Based on his public writings, I would expect this scientist to be personable and humane. Nevertheless, in his private correspondence, he casually wishes for the deaths of many millions of his fellow human beings. If he were merely offering an eccentric, private opinion, I wouldn’t be writing about it. Unfortunately, his desire is all too common among some self-described “environmentalists.” Our wellbeing, on this view, doesn’t really enter into the calculation. We are, at best, an accident of cosmic history, and at worst, despoilers and destroyers. Adding more humans to the planet, then, is as bad as adding more parasites to an already ailing host.
Again, this would be merely academic, except that such ideas have real world consequences. Every environmental policy implemented by government authority, for instance, stems from someone’s views about the nature of man and man’s place in nature. If those views are anti-human, the policy probably will be anti-human as well. Consider the ban on DDT in the 1970s.
The ban, which in hindsight we know was misguided, has resulted in the deaths of more than a million people a year. The vast majority of these deaths have been among the poor in developing countries.
Because environmental policies perpetuate certain notions about the human person, and because these notions have real world consequences, Christians have little choice but to engage the debate over the environment. In particular, we should strongly challenge the misanthropic strain in the modern environmental movement. Human beings aren’t an accident. We are an intended part of God’s good creation. And while God called everything he created “good,” he only called human beings, whom He created in his own image, “very good.”
(click on post title for full article)
The tragic consequences, whether it is the premature banning of DDT and the resulting resurgence of mosquito borne diseases, or the protection of animals at the expense of human being's health and welfare, starkly remind us that all voices need to be raised in the public square.
God and Man in the Environmental Debate
by Jay W. Richards, Director of Institutional Relations
I recently received a letter from a leading botanist at a prominent scientific institution. The letter was mostly agreeable and even complimentary. But near the end, when humanity became the subject, its tone darkened. The scientist said he disagreed with me that human beings were part of the plan, as it were. On the contrary, he complained about “the devastation humans are currently imposing upon our planet”:
"Still, adding over seventy million new humans to the planet each year, the future looks pretty bleak to me. Surely, the Black Death was one of the best things that ever happened to Europe: elevating the worth of human labor, reducing environmental degradation, and, rather promptly, producing the Renaissance. From where I sit, Planet Earth could use another major human pandemic, and pronto!"
Based on his public writings, I would expect this scientist to be personable and humane. Nevertheless, in his private correspondence, he casually wishes for the deaths of many millions of his fellow human beings. If he were merely offering an eccentric, private opinion, I wouldn’t be writing about it. Unfortunately, his desire is all too common among some self-described “environmentalists.” Our wellbeing, on this view, doesn’t really enter into the calculation. We are, at best, an accident of cosmic history, and at worst, despoilers and destroyers. Adding more humans to the planet, then, is as bad as adding more parasites to an already ailing host.
Again, this would be merely academic, except that such ideas have real world consequences. Every environmental policy implemented by government authority, for instance, stems from someone’s views about the nature of man and man’s place in nature. If those views are anti-human, the policy probably will be anti-human as well. Consider the ban on DDT in the 1970s.
The ban, which in hindsight we know was misguided, has resulted in the deaths of more than a million people a year. The vast majority of these deaths have been among the poor in developing countries.
Because environmental policies perpetuate certain notions about the human person, and because these notions have real world consequences, Christians have little choice but to engage the debate over the environment. In particular, we should strongly challenge the misanthropic strain in the modern environmental movement. Human beings aren’t an accident. We are an intended part of God’s good creation. And while God called everything he created “good,” he only called human beings, whom He created in his own image, “very good.”
(click on post title for full article)
Thursday, December 01, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Seven
Another installment in the Bee series on flooding focuses on the cost of the levee fix, which at an initial maximum figure of $12 billion is still much less than the $26 billion estimated loss, which does not account for the incalculable costs of ruined lives, that a major flood would cost Sacramento.
Clearly, it is time for public leadership to address this straight on, and however large the task appears, the public’s safety and community well-being are well worth it.
California once led the nation in infrastructure, and we certainly still have that capability, and one hopes the political will is building.
Fixing levees is huge task, experts tell lawmakers
A rough price tag is $7 billion to $12 billion, Assembly panels are advised, but the cost could easily double, too.
By Carrie Peyton Dahlberg -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Thursday, December 1, 2005
It's impossible to put a solid number today on what it would cost to shore up California's levees, but the roughest guesses run well into the billions, state water officials told Assembly members Wednesday.
The $7 billion to $12 billion price tag they outlined is intended only to give lawmakers a feel for the scope of the problem, said Les Harder, acting deputy director of the state Department of Water Resources.
The true amount might run less than that - or it could easily double, he said in an interview after a joint hearing by Assembly committees on water and infrastructure.
"People are clamoring for these numbers," Harder said, but "there's very little information to justify them." It would take up to $200 million just to quantify the problem, through a massive study probing the structure of mile after mile of levees.
Harder was among more than a dozen experts in flood control, finance, land use and local government called in to help lawmakers understand what's at stake in keeping the Central Valley dry, what's gone wrong and what it will take to fix it.
In Sacramento alone, three levee breaks during a heavy, "200-year" storm would cause about $11 billion in property damage and up to $15 billion more in lost wages, taxes and other costs, according to one Water Resources scenario. Bigger floods would boost that toll.
"People are really underestimating the risk," said Sacramento Assemblyman Dave Jones.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/projects/flooding/story/13923908p-14760910c.html
Clearly, it is time for public leadership to address this straight on, and however large the task appears, the public’s safety and community well-being are well worth it.
California once led the nation in infrastructure, and we certainly still have that capability, and one hopes the political will is building.
Fixing levees is huge task, experts tell lawmakers
A rough price tag is $7 billion to $12 billion, Assembly panels are advised, but the cost could easily double, too.
By Carrie Peyton Dahlberg -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Thursday, December 1, 2005
It's impossible to put a solid number today on what it would cost to shore up California's levees, but the roughest guesses run well into the billions, state water officials told Assembly members Wednesday.
The $7 billion to $12 billion price tag they outlined is intended only to give lawmakers a feel for the scope of the problem, said Les Harder, acting deputy director of the state Department of Water Resources.
The true amount might run less than that - or it could easily double, he said in an interview after a joint hearing by Assembly committees on water and infrastructure.
"People are clamoring for these numbers," Harder said, but "there's very little information to justify them." It would take up to $200 million just to quantify the problem, through a massive study probing the structure of mile after mile of levees.
Harder was among more than a dozen experts in flood control, finance, land use and local government called in to help lawmakers understand what's at stake in keeping the Central Valley dry, what's gone wrong and what it will take to fix it.
In Sacramento alone, three levee breaks during a heavy, "200-year" storm would cause about $11 billion in property damage and up to $15 billion more in lost wages, taxes and other costs, according to one Water Resources scenario. Bigger floods would boost that toll.
"People are really underestimating the risk," said Sacramento Assemblyman Dave Jones.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/projects/flooding/story/13923908p-14760910c.html
Wednesday, November 30, 2005
Nonprofit Management of Sacramento Zoo
The nonprofit Sacramento Zoological Society took over management of the Sacramento Zoo several years ago due to the city being unable to care for it, and the benefits have been consistently good, as witnessed by this latest effort, from today's Bee, of fundraising and planned growth.
The key comment here is: "The nonprofit Sacramento Zoological Society spearheaded fundraising efforts...", fundraising capability being a huge benefit of having a nonprofit contract with the public ownership to manage a major public resource, as our organization is calling for with the Parkway.
Caring for the critters
Sacramento Zoo to build on-site veterinary hospital
By Erika Chavez -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, November 30, 2005
The ring-tailed lemur soon will have a place to repose, and the spotted hyena will have a haven in which to heal.
A groundbreaking ceremony Thursday at the Sacramento Zoo will be the first step toward a long-awaited on-site veterinary hospital, a $2.5 million project slated for completion by next fall.
The Dr. Murray E. Fowler Veterinary Hospital will house a laboratory, treatment rooms, intensive-care unit, holding and surgery facilities, said Mary Healy, director of the Sacramento Zoo.
Windows will allow zoo visitors to watch as the animals are cared for, a rare "behind-the-scenes" peek into the inner workings of a modern zoo.
The 5,000-square-foot hospital will be a key part of maintaining the zoo's accreditation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, Healy said.
The goal: to maintain a healthy animal population through routine physicals and exams.
"Preventive medicine has become a much larger piece of taking care of zoo animals than it has been historically," Healy said. "We've been making do with a one-room clinic and a bathroom that we converted for X-ray processing, but we know we need to get more sophisticated with our animal care."
The nonprofit Sacramento Zoological Society spearheaded fundraising efforts and, to date, has raised more than $1 million. The society's board decided to take out a loan to cover the remainder of construction costs.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13919621p-14757784c.html
The key comment here is: "The nonprofit Sacramento Zoological Society spearheaded fundraising efforts...", fundraising capability being a huge benefit of having a nonprofit contract with the public ownership to manage a major public resource, as our organization is calling for with the Parkway.
Caring for the critters
Sacramento Zoo to build on-site veterinary hospital
By Erika Chavez -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, November 30, 2005
The ring-tailed lemur soon will have a place to repose, and the spotted hyena will have a haven in which to heal.
A groundbreaking ceremony Thursday at the Sacramento Zoo will be the first step toward a long-awaited on-site veterinary hospital, a $2.5 million project slated for completion by next fall.
The Dr. Murray E. Fowler Veterinary Hospital will house a laboratory, treatment rooms, intensive-care unit, holding and surgery facilities, said Mary Healy, director of the Sacramento Zoo.
Windows will allow zoo visitors to watch as the animals are cared for, a rare "behind-the-scenes" peek into the inner workings of a modern zoo.
The 5,000-square-foot hospital will be a key part of maintaining the zoo's accreditation with the American Zoo and Aquarium Association, Healy said.
The goal: to maintain a healthy animal population through routine physicals and exams.
"Preventive medicine has become a much larger piece of taking care of zoo animals than it has been historically," Healy said. "We've been making do with a one-room clinic and a bathroom that we converted for X-ray processing, but we know we need to get more sophisticated with our animal care."
The nonprofit Sacramento Zoological Society spearheaded fundraising efforts and, to date, has raised more than $1 million. The society's board decided to take out a loan to cover the remainder of construction costs.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13919621p-14757784c.html
Tuesday, November 29, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Six
As this story from yesterday's Bee shows, one of the poorest neighborhoods in the area, North Sacramento, will be the hardest hit when floods come again.
North Sacramento is also blessed with one of the most beautiful areas of the Parkway, though cursed by large scale illegal camping by the homeless and related crime, which local political leaders seem unable to address effectively; similar to how they are dealing (so far) with flood protection.
Facing the deepest risk
Quiet N. Sac neighborhood could be hit hardest in flood
By Carrie Peyton Dahlberg -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Monday, November 28, 2005
Adriana Figueroa loves the mound of flowers that rises toward her front yard fountain in a crescendo of pink, purple and red. For Nancy Her, it's the peacefulness of her street, and the step-down family room that offers a welcome bit of space in a house jammed with six kids and two parents.
Like hundreds of thousands of others in the Sacramento region, the Figueroas and the Hers have made their homes behind levees, putting up family photos, raising children and chasing dreams where water could someday flow.
Unlike others, though, they live in a tidy corner of North Sacramento that boasts an unfortunate distinction.
It is the place where water could run deepest under levee-break scenarios modeled by the city and county of Sacramento to help plan evacuations.
"We're in the dead zone, you could say," said Pang Her, 23, as she sized up where her parents' house lies on city flood maps.
If levees gave way, murky floodwater would engulf the Hers' backyard chicken pen and pour through front and back doors. Water would top the wrought iron fence, the white-trimmed windows and even the shingled roof, reaching 25 feet in just three days, according to one scenario.
No other levee break in Sacramento would heap more water onto a single community during the hypothetical "hundred-year" storm that the city and county use to model how best to respond if various levees give way.
For the rest of the story:
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13913851p-14752209c.html
North Sacramento is also blessed with one of the most beautiful areas of the Parkway, though cursed by large scale illegal camping by the homeless and related crime, which local political leaders seem unable to address effectively; similar to how they are dealing (so far) with flood protection.
Facing the deepest risk
Quiet N. Sac neighborhood could be hit hardest in flood
By Carrie Peyton Dahlberg -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Monday, November 28, 2005
Adriana Figueroa loves the mound of flowers that rises toward her front yard fountain in a crescendo of pink, purple and red. For Nancy Her, it's the peacefulness of her street, and the step-down family room that offers a welcome bit of space in a house jammed with six kids and two parents.
Like hundreds of thousands of others in the Sacramento region, the Figueroas and the Hers have made their homes behind levees, putting up family photos, raising children and chasing dreams where water could someday flow.
Unlike others, though, they live in a tidy corner of North Sacramento that boasts an unfortunate distinction.
It is the place where water could run deepest under levee-break scenarios modeled by the city and county of Sacramento to help plan evacuations.
"We're in the dead zone, you could say," said Pang Her, 23, as she sized up where her parents' house lies on city flood maps.
If levees gave way, murky floodwater would engulf the Hers' backyard chicken pen and pour through front and back doors. Water would top the wrought iron fence, the white-trimmed windows and even the shingled roof, reaching 25 feet in just three days, according to one scenario.
No other levee break in Sacramento would heap more water onto a single community during the hypothetical "hundred-year" storm that the city and county use to model how best to respond if various levees give way.
For the rest of the story:
http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13913851p-14752209c.html
Monday, November 28, 2005
Sacramento Flooding, Part Five
This is the continuation of the excellent series, Tempting Fate, by the Bee about the potential for flooding in Sacramento, which most experts agree is not a matter of if but when, and how bad, unless we do something substantial about storing the vast amounts of water that can flow into the American River watershed and hence the Sacramento River, during a major series of storms, such as those we witnessed in 1986 and 1997.
Today’s article focuses on the available maps showing where the flooding would occur and at what depth, for several scenarios of levee failure.
Tomorrow we will post the second article about the effect on one particular community, North Sacramento.
Flood maps help plan for peril
They show who's at risk, how to exit
By Deb Kollars -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Monday, November 28, 2005
Levee by levee, road by road, the city and county of Sacramento have pieced together plans for something they hope they never have to do: evacuate whole neighborhoods in a catastrophic flood.
The two governing agencies have developed an eye-opening collection of flood maps that show 18 hypothetical levee breaks, where the water would spread under worst-case scenarios, and how deep it would get.
Another 18 companion maps show evacuation routes and, chillingly, which of those routes could become inundated in a flood.
The maps, which have been shared with residents at recent city meetings and are being distributed online today by The Bee, come as part of a wave of stepped-up preparedness by cities, counties, school districts and hospitals across the region.
Heavy on the minds of those entrusted with public health and safety: the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in the South in late summer. And the fact that there is no other major American city more at risk of a Katrina-style flood than Sacramento.
For people who live and work here, the maps couldn't have arrived too soon.
Joan Irving, for example, is a legal secretary who lives in south Sacramento. After attending one of the city's emergency preparedness meetings in September, she left with a boatload of questions.
"I'm a mother working downtown, with a daughter in college and three grandchildren at two different schools," she said. "If there's an emergency and they evacuate the kids, where are they going to be taken? How will we all find each other?"
Her concerns echoed the thoughts of many, who have questioned how prepared the community is to handle a flood.
Both the city and the county of Sacramento have lengthy plans in place to handle a flood emergency, from monitoring levees to ordering sandbags to sheltering evacuees.
But a number of local agencies and institutions are far from being ready. Several are retooling plans after watching the inadequate emergency response in New Orleans. Others acknowledged they are starting from scratch. Still others are simply scratching their heads.
The new city of Rancho Cordova, for example, does not yet have an emergency plan for a flood, and would follow Sacramento County's if a crisis arose. The city of West Sacramento has a plan that was updated last year, but the city still is working to identify day-care centers, senior centers and other vulnerable populations on its maps. The Grant Joint Union High School District has no plan for evacuating schools in flood-prone areas.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/projects/flooding/story/13913859p-14752214c.html
Today’s article focuses on the available maps showing where the flooding would occur and at what depth, for several scenarios of levee failure.
Tomorrow we will post the second article about the effect on one particular community, North Sacramento.
Flood maps help plan for peril
They show who's at risk, how to exit
By Deb Kollars -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Monday, November 28, 2005
Levee by levee, road by road, the city and county of Sacramento have pieced together plans for something they hope they never have to do: evacuate whole neighborhoods in a catastrophic flood.
The two governing agencies have developed an eye-opening collection of flood maps that show 18 hypothetical levee breaks, where the water would spread under worst-case scenarios, and how deep it would get.
Another 18 companion maps show evacuation routes and, chillingly, which of those routes could become inundated in a flood.
The maps, which have been shared with residents at recent city meetings and are being distributed online today by The Bee, come as part of a wave of stepped-up preparedness by cities, counties, school districts and hospitals across the region.
Heavy on the minds of those entrusted with public health and safety: the devastation of Hurricane Katrina in the South in late summer. And the fact that there is no other major American city more at risk of a Katrina-style flood than Sacramento.
For people who live and work here, the maps couldn't have arrived too soon.
Joan Irving, for example, is a legal secretary who lives in south Sacramento. After attending one of the city's emergency preparedness meetings in September, she left with a boatload of questions.
"I'm a mother working downtown, with a daughter in college and three grandchildren at two different schools," she said. "If there's an emergency and they evacuate the kids, where are they going to be taken? How will we all find each other?"
Her concerns echoed the thoughts of many, who have questioned how prepared the community is to handle a flood.
Both the city and the county of Sacramento have lengthy plans in place to handle a flood emergency, from monitoring levees to ordering sandbags to sheltering evacuees.
But a number of local agencies and institutions are far from being ready. Several are retooling plans after watching the inadequate emergency response in New Orleans. Others acknowledged they are starting from scratch. Still others are simply scratching their heads.
The new city of Rancho Cordova, for example, does not yet have an emergency plan for a flood, and would follow Sacramento County's if a crisis arose. The city of West Sacramento has a plan that was updated last year, but the city still is working to identify day-care centers, senior centers and other vulnerable populations on its maps. The Grant Joint Union High School District has no plan for evacuating schools in flood-prone areas.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/projects/flooding/story/13913859p-14752214c.html
Tuesday, November 22, 2005
Book Review: Nature Noir
This is a very interesting review of the acclaimed book about the American River in the area once destined (and perhaps again) to become the Auburn Dam, which reminds us, unfortunately, of the Lower Reach of the Parkway we reported on this year.
It also reminds us of the importance of having an active stewardship to ensure our natural resources remain the priceless and safe sanctuaries we wish them to be.
SIERRA STAKEOUT
Ranger exposes underside of natural, human-made dramas
Reviewed by Jennie Yabroff San Francisco Chronicle
Sunday, February 13, 2005
Nature Noir
A Park Ranger's Patrol in the Sierra
By Jordan Fisher Smith
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN; 220 Pages; $24
"Follow the water." No Deep-Throated environmental informant actually whispers this advice to writer Jordan Fisher Smith late one night in a deserted campground, but the sentiment infuses "Nature Noir," his taut drama of life as a ranger in the Sierra.
Fisher Smith's book follows the tradition of nature writers such as Emerson, Thoreau, John Muir and Annie Dillard. But "Nature Noir" is no Emersonian ode to pastoral transcendentalism, nor is it a Muirian celebration of the sacred in the wilderness.
The writer who most closely anticipates Fisher Smith's themes is Joan Didion, who wrote, in 1977, "some of us who live in arid parts of the world think about water with a reverence others might find excessive."
Fisher Smith would probably find nothing unusual about this obsession. Because for the 14 years he worked the canyons of the American River, he lived under the daily specter of the ravine being flooded for a dam.
Fisher Smith does much to dispel the notion of park users as docile birdwatchers in hiking shorts or rangers as kindly wildflower guides in khaki hats.
His job implies protecting the people from nature, but the reality is more often vice versa.
The hunters, fishermen and miners he encounters are drawn to the recreation area not because of an inherent love of clean air and open sky, but because camping is a cheap way to live with little outside interference.
When he begins the job, another ranger explains he shouldn't try to collect campsite fees the first Thursday of the month, because it's "Cheese Day": the day the government doles out surplus food.
Miners supplement these handouts with the flakes of gold they manage to dredge from the river bottom. Squatters manufacture illegal drugs in shacks hidden deep in the woods. Extreme recreators view the park as a giant obstacle course for their cars, off-road vehicles and parachutes.
For the rest of the review: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/02/13/RVGVLB5LJI1.DTL
It also reminds us of the importance of having an active stewardship to ensure our natural resources remain the priceless and safe sanctuaries we wish them to be.
SIERRA STAKEOUT
Ranger exposes underside of natural, human-made dramas
Reviewed by Jennie Yabroff San Francisco Chronicle
Sunday, February 13, 2005
Nature Noir
A Park Ranger's Patrol in the Sierra
By Jordan Fisher Smith
HOUGHTON MIFFLIN; 220 Pages; $24
"Follow the water." No Deep-Throated environmental informant actually whispers this advice to writer Jordan Fisher Smith late one night in a deserted campground, but the sentiment infuses "Nature Noir," his taut drama of life as a ranger in the Sierra.
Fisher Smith's book follows the tradition of nature writers such as Emerson, Thoreau, John Muir and Annie Dillard. But "Nature Noir" is no Emersonian ode to pastoral transcendentalism, nor is it a Muirian celebration of the sacred in the wilderness.
The writer who most closely anticipates Fisher Smith's themes is Joan Didion, who wrote, in 1977, "some of us who live in arid parts of the world think about water with a reverence others might find excessive."
Fisher Smith would probably find nothing unusual about this obsession. Because for the 14 years he worked the canyons of the American River, he lived under the daily specter of the ravine being flooded for a dam.
Fisher Smith does much to dispel the notion of park users as docile birdwatchers in hiking shorts or rangers as kindly wildflower guides in khaki hats.
His job implies protecting the people from nature, but the reality is more often vice versa.
The hunters, fishermen and miners he encounters are drawn to the recreation area not because of an inherent love of clean air and open sky, but because camping is a cheap way to live with little outside interference.
When he begins the job, another ranger explains he shouldn't try to collect campsite fees the first Thursday of the month, because it's "Cheese Day": the day the government doles out surplus food.
Miners supplement these handouts with the flakes of gold they manage to dredge from the river bottom. Squatters manufacture illegal drugs in shacks hidden deep in the woods. Extreme recreators view the park as a giant obstacle course for their cars, off-road vehicles and parachutes.
For the rest of the review: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/02/13/RVGVLB5LJI1.DTL
Monday, November 21, 2005
Scary Flood Map
This article from the Bee on Friday about what Sacramento would look like after a 500 year flood, shows a huge lake covering all of the city of Sacramento with the American River becoming an inlet and much of the Parkway submerged.
Scary is certainly the right word to describe it.
Scary flood map sparks a call for state assistance
By Matt Weiser -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 am PST Friday, November 18, 2005
Sacramento Valley politicians on Thursday called for a statewide effort to protect the region from flooding, citing its strategic importance to the California economy.
But board members of the Sacramento Area Council of Governments stopped short of discussing growth controls that would keep more homes from being built in areas likely to flood.
The discussion was triggered in large part by an eye-popping map developed by the SACOG staff that illustrates a 500-year flood event in the six-county region. The term refers to a massive storm with a one in 500 chance of occurring in any year. The results would be devastating: a solid carpet of floodwater stretching up to 20 miles wide between the Sutter Buttes in the north and Highway 12 in the south.
"I think a storm like this is coming. It just hasn't hit us yet," said Les Harder, acting deputy director of the state Department of Water Resources, who briefed the board on potential flood damages.
Harder said most of the Valley's levees were built to protect farms and offer as little as 50-year protection. This is "simply inadequate" for the urbanization now taking place, he said.
On the 500-year map, multiple levee breaks would put many communities and highways under water. In some places, that water would be only inches deep. But the map brought home the consequences of inaction for the gathered city and county leaders, most of whom depend to some degree on aging, unstable levees.
"If there's any validity to this map, can we responsibly not treat it as a planning document?" said Linda Budge, Rancho Cordova city councilwoman. "We have the unfortunate advantage of having seen what happens (in New Orleans) when you don't have a plan. We need to figure out what to do about it."
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13874659p-14713970c.html
Scary is certainly the right word to describe it.
Scary flood map sparks a call for state assistance
By Matt Weiser -- Bee Staff Writer
Published 2:15 am PST Friday, November 18, 2005
Sacramento Valley politicians on Thursday called for a statewide effort to protect the region from flooding, citing its strategic importance to the California economy.
But board members of the Sacramento Area Council of Governments stopped short of discussing growth controls that would keep more homes from being built in areas likely to flood.
The discussion was triggered in large part by an eye-popping map developed by the SACOG staff that illustrates a 500-year flood event in the six-county region. The term refers to a massive storm with a one in 500 chance of occurring in any year. The results would be devastating: a solid carpet of floodwater stretching up to 20 miles wide between the Sutter Buttes in the north and Highway 12 in the south.
"I think a storm like this is coming. It just hasn't hit us yet," said Les Harder, acting deputy director of the state Department of Water Resources, who briefed the board on potential flood damages.
Harder said most of the Valley's levees were built to protect farms and offer as little as 50-year protection. This is "simply inadequate" for the urbanization now taking place, he said.
On the 500-year map, multiple levee breaks would put many communities and highways under water. In some places, that water would be only inches deep. But the map brought home the consequences of inaction for the gathered city and county leaders, most of whom depend to some degree on aging, unstable levees.
"If there's any validity to this map, can we responsibly not treat it as a planning document?" said Linda Budge, Rancho Cordova city councilwoman. "We have the unfortunate advantage of having seen what happens (in New Orleans) when you don't have a plan. We need to figure out what to do about it."
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13874659p-14713970c.html
Friday, November 18, 2005
The Shrinking Uncity, Part Two
As a follow up to yesterday’s post about the rush of new city incorporation efforts, here is a recent story about the Fair Oaks/Orangevale/Gold River effort.
Fair Oaks to study cityhood feasibility
By Lakiesha McGhee -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Thursday, November 17, 2005
A citizens committee is stepping up its efforts to determine if Fair Oaks - a community of about 29,000 people - can operate as a city and possibly merge with neighboring Orangevale and Gold River.
Members last week said they are requesting proposals from six consultants to conduct a feasibility study that will identify potential barriers to Fair Oaks cityhood, such as costs and revenue sources, boundary issues, and effects on Sacramento County and other local governments. The committee has set a Jan. 16 deadline to receive proposals.
"I'm pushing for the feasibility study to get started as soon as we can," member Jim Purcell said Wednesday night at a community meeting.
The committee plans to file for nonprofit status to raise funds to pay for the initial feasibility study and a following comprehensive fiscal analysis of the proposed incorporation.
Feasibility studies generally cost about $30,000 and can take at least six months to complete, Purcell said. Committee members said they will seek donations from organizations, special districts and cities that may be supportive of their cause.
The Fair Oaks Chamber of Commerce, which has sponsored the committee's monthly meetings, has not been formally approached to help finance a study, chamber past president Joe Spagnoli said at the meeting. However, the chamber has a political action committee to raise funds for the study if it chooses to do so, he said.
During the past six months, the volunteer committee has weighed the potential benefits and pitfalls of incorporating Fair Oaks and meshing with Orange-vale and Gold River under a borough system like the one used in New York City.
The goal: Maintain community identity and keep tax dollars and fees paid by residents within their respective communities.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/community_news/citrus_heights/story/13866168p-14705671c.html
Fair Oaks to study cityhood feasibility
By Lakiesha McGhee -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Thursday, November 17, 2005
A citizens committee is stepping up its efforts to determine if Fair Oaks - a community of about 29,000 people - can operate as a city and possibly merge with neighboring Orangevale and Gold River.
Members last week said they are requesting proposals from six consultants to conduct a feasibility study that will identify potential barriers to Fair Oaks cityhood, such as costs and revenue sources, boundary issues, and effects on Sacramento County and other local governments. The committee has set a Jan. 16 deadline to receive proposals.
"I'm pushing for the feasibility study to get started as soon as we can," member Jim Purcell said Wednesday night at a community meeting.
The committee plans to file for nonprofit status to raise funds to pay for the initial feasibility study and a following comprehensive fiscal analysis of the proposed incorporation.
Feasibility studies generally cost about $30,000 and can take at least six months to complete, Purcell said. Committee members said they will seek donations from organizations, special districts and cities that may be supportive of their cause.
The Fair Oaks Chamber of Commerce, which has sponsored the committee's monthly meetings, has not been formally approached to help finance a study, chamber past president Joe Spagnoli said at the meeting. However, the chamber has a political action committee to raise funds for the study if it chooses to do so, he said.
During the past six months, the volunteer committee has weighed the potential benefits and pitfalls of incorporating Fair Oaks and meshing with Orange-vale and Gold River under a borough system like the one used in New York City.
The goal: Maintain community identity and keep tax dollars and fees paid by residents within their respective communities.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/community_news/citrus_heights/story/13866168p-14705671c.html
Thursday, November 17, 2005
The Shrinking Uncity
One of the major reasons Sacramento County is unable to take care of the Parkway, and a reason underlying why we have called for daily management of the Parkway to be contracted to a nonprofit conservancy, is that the County is rapidly dwindling in size and resources.
In a Bee editorial yesterday, the shrinking County is addressed again.
If all of the incorporations of new cities that are now being planned in the County occur, and many of them will, the County will eventually consist of Carmichael and Antelope, period.
While that is a good thing in the sense of those municipalities wanting control over their own destiny having it, it is a very bad thing for the Parkway as long as the County is responsible for Parkway management, as the Parkway is already at the bottom of a County funding priority list of an ever-shrinking pie of tax revenue.
Editorial: Uncities left behind
Incorporation bids overlook big territories
Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, November 16, 2005
The Uncity, the unincorporated communities of Sacramento, have never seen such a simultaneous flurry to leave the county's control and create cities of their own.
In the communities of Rio Linda and Elverta, activists are halfway to raising the necessary funds for a feasibility study of a 25,000-person city. In Arden-Arcade, a collection of neighborhoods encompassing Fulton and Eastern avenues, activists continue their efforts toward a possible vote in 2008 to create a city of 100,000. And in Orangevale, Fair Oaks and Gold River, hundreds of residents are attending forums to explore whether to jointly create yet a third new city.
All of these efforts are similar in that they trace the local geographic boundaries that fit the desired local and economic identity. But the boundaries pose a problem. It is what they leave out. While we support municipalization of the Uncity, a bunch of minicities isn't the optimal solution.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/13865942p-14705540c.html
In a Bee editorial yesterday, the shrinking County is addressed again.
If all of the incorporations of new cities that are now being planned in the County occur, and many of them will, the County will eventually consist of Carmichael and Antelope, period.
While that is a good thing in the sense of those municipalities wanting control over their own destiny having it, it is a very bad thing for the Parkway as long as the County is responsible for Parkway management, as the Parkway is already at the bottom of a County funding priority list of an ever-shrinking pie of tax revenue.
Editorial: Uncities left behind
Incorporation bids overlook big territories
Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, November 16, 2005
The Uncity, the unincorporated communities of Sacramento, have never seen such a simultaneous flurry to leave the county's control and create cities of their own.
In the communities of Rio Linda and Elverta, activists are halfway to raising the necessary funds for a feasibility study of a 25,000-person city. In Arden-Arcade, a collection of neighborhoods encompassing Fulton and Eastern avenues, activists continue their efforts toward a possible vote in 2008 to create a city of 100,000. And in Orangevale, Fair Oaks and Gold River, hundreds of residents are attending forums to explore whether to jointly create yet a third new city.
All of these efforts are similar in that they trace the local geographic boundaries that fit the desired local and economic identity. But the boundaries pose a problem. It is what they leave out. While we support municipalization of the Uncity, a bunch of minicities isn't the optimal solution.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/opinion/story/13865942p-14705540c.html
Wednesday, November 16, 2005
Sounds of Silence
This is a delightful article from the LA Times yesterday, about the value of nature’s quiet, the moments many of us experience in the Parkway, when all we hear are the sounds of nature.
Nature’s quiet is so rare today, so precious in our urban environment, and so worth preserving, protecting, and strengthening.
A voice for silence
· One man, writes John Balzar, thinks quiet may be Earth's most endangered natural resource.
By John Balzar, Times Staff Writer
There are only seven or eight quiet places remaining in the United States.Fewer than 10. In the entire nation.
Barely more than half a dozen in all the parks, wilderness, refuges and "wild" spaces that we treasure.
Fewer all the time.
Quiet is going extinct.
These thoughts turn over in the mind as you explore one of these few quiet places left in North America, perhaps the quietest of them all. Your guide is a man who has given his career to listening and recording the pure sounds of nature — and searching for meaning in what they convey.
He has become one of the few Americans to raise his voice on behalf of the vanishing quiet.
Naturally, your purpose here is to inquire about the value of this timeless thing that is slipping away without … well, without alarm, without a sense of loss, without broad public discussion. But something else occurs along the way. When you enter the realm of quiet to ponder it, the quiet awakens in you a missing bond with the natural world. The quieter the surroundings, the more — and the better — you hear. The world around you expands into a three-dimensional place.
Listen.
No need to strain. Just listen.That is the autumn sound of yellowed maple leaves falling from the tree and settling on the forest floor 50 feet away. It is a sound you've never consciously heard.
More to the point, it is a sound you didn't know you could hear.
It sounds faintly like nature giving itself a gentle round of applause.
Spiritual balm"QUIET is the think tank of the soul."
For the rest of the article: http://www.latimes.com/travel/outdoors/la-os-quiet15nov15,0,7904747.story?coll=la-home-outdoors
Nature’s quiet is so rare today, so precious in our urban environment, and so worth preserving, protecting, and strengthening.
A voice for silence
· One man, writes John Balzar, thinks quiet may be Earth's most endangered natural resource.
By John Balzar, Times Staff Writer
There are only seven or eight quiet places remaining in the United States.Fewer than 10. In the entire nation.
Barely more than half a dozen in all the parks, wilderness, refuges and "wild" spaces that we treasure.
Fewer all the time.
Quiet is going extinct.
These thoughts turn over in the mind as you explore one of these few quiet places left in North America, perhaps the quietest of them all. Your guide is a man who has given his career to listening and recording the pure sounds of nature — and searching for meaning in what they convey.
He has become one of the few Americans to raise his voice on behalf of the vanishing quiet.
Naturally, your purpose here is to inquire about the value of this timeless thing that is slipping away without … well, without alarm, without a sense of loss, without broad public discussion. But something else occurs along the way. When you enter the realm of quiet to ponder it, the quiet awakens in you a missing bond with the natural world. The quieter the surroundings, the more — and the better — you hear. The world around you expands into a three-dimensional place.
Listen.
No need to strain. Just listen.That is the autumn sound of yellowed maple leaves falling from the tree and settling on the forest floor 50 feet away. It is a sound you've never consciously heard.
More to the point, it is a sound you didn't know you could hear.
It sounds faintly like nature giving itself a gentle round of applause.
Spiritual balm"QUIET is the think tank of the soul."
For the rest of the article: http://www.latimes.com/travel/outdoors/la-os-quiet15nov15,0,7904747.story?coll=la-home-outdoors
Tuesday, November 15, 2005
Water Supply, RAND Study
A major study has just been released by RAND about water, from which we will draw some direction in the coming year as we study the water supply and demand locally. Here is an excerpt and a link to information about either downloading it for free as a pdf document or purchsing it.
“In the last 70 years, the world’s population has tripled in size while going from overwhelmingly rural to a near balance of urban and rural—a change that affects both how humans use water and the amount they consume.
“In the late 1980’s, concern over a potential water crisis began to grow. Much of the resulting literature has taken an alarmist view. Numerous reports sensationalized the so-called water crisis without taking into account the local or regional nature of water resources and the relationship between supply and demand. A number of factors are cited to support the position that the earth is headed toward a water crisis. They include the following:
The human population continues to grow.
Water withdrawals are outpacing population growth.
Per-capita water availability is declining.
Clean, potable water is less available worldwide.
“However, calculations of water resources rely on factors that are difficult to measure. It is important to consider the following:
Water supply and demand are difficult to measure accurately.
Water management plays an important role in the supply of and demand for water.
Population forecasts are changeable.
“Given these limitations, predictions of water scarcity may be overstated. At the same time, the risk of a water shortage remains.”
RAND. (2005). Liquid Assets: (pp. xiii-xiv)
For further information: http://www.rand.org/publications/MG/MG358/
Monday, November 14, 2005
Salmon, the Aboriginal Habitat
Here is a very informative article about salmon, in their aboriginal habitat, from Open Space magazine.
Salmon and the Northwest
by Roy Hemmingway
Here in the Lower Forty-Eight, and in much of western Canada, natural habitat has almost vanished... Much that civilization demands for its sustenance has had a consequence in the fate of the salmon.
There is not much of it left. Of untouched salmon habitat there is almost none. Although salmon once occupied almost every ocean-seeking stream in the Pacific Northwest, the map where salmon go has been shrinking for the last hundred years, sometimes gradually as human forces slowly worsened the habitat, sometimes suddenly when millions of acres of habitat were blocked by dams.
Now to see the headwater-to-the-sea habitat where the salmon thrive in abundance, one must go to Alaska. Here in the Lower Forty-eight, and in much of western Canada, it has almost vanished. A century and a half of logging, farming, ranching, mining, damming, road building, and urbanizing activity has taken its toll. Much that civilization demands for its sustenance has had a consequence in the fate of the salmon.
The Aboriginal Habitat
Only in a handful of small pockets, miniature and isolated ecosystems, can there still be found habitat as it once was. On the Oregon coast, just south of the town of Yachats, is a little untouched watershed, barely eight miles from the headwaters to the ocean. Cummins Creek winds through a narrow, steep-sided valley. There, free from the ax and chainsaw, and now protected under the federal Wilderness Act, trees many feet thick rise to the sky, almost blocking out the sun.
Over years, as trees have died, they have fallen or been blown into the creek. Although the creek is small and shallow in many places, even in the low water of summer it is a struggle for humans to walk the streambed. Tree trunks are everywhere in the creek, creating dams over which the water must plunge, digging out pools that could soak a person up to the neck. Gravel bars have built up where the creek slows. The fallen trees push the creek from bank to bank, undercutting, and causing more trees, rootwads and all, to end up in the creek bed. All this adds up to stream "complexity,"a diverse set of stream conditions that create the habitat needed for healthy salmon.
In other streams, where the trees have not been allowed to mature and die and end up in the creek, what we see is a far more simplified stream. What most of us now envision as the pristine natural stream, bubbling along at a uniform pace smoothly to the sea, is not what the pioneers saw in many of the Northwest watersheds. Instead, west of the Cascades, they found creeks so choked with trees that in places they could not reach the water for the many layers of criss-crossing trunks over the streambed. On the larger rivers, log jams were common barriers to navigation, which had to be blown up or painstakingly picked apart by men who risked their lives not knowing when the jam would give way.
Whether for aesthetics or practicalities, man in the American West has systematically rid both large and small streams of the logs, boulders, and other "debris"that shape the stream and give life to salmon. Abundant beaver built dams on the smaller streams. The ponds behind the dams gave refuge to juvenile salmon from the high currents of winter floods and the warm waters of summer droughts. Now trapped and driven from much of their previous range, beaver once were as ubiquitous in the Northwest as salmon.
The simplified stream channels now seen everywhere and which have such dire consequences for salmon are in no small part due to the absence of beaver. Before the effects of man, creeks and streams and rivers moved across their floodplains, changing positions as high water cut new channels and dammed up old ones. Floods spread out into multiple channels, where the over-wintering juvenile salmon could find refuge from the fast water. In summer, these streams, slowed and directed by logs and boulders near the banks, dug deep channels, keeping the water cool throughout the hot days. It was into these conditions that the salmon evolved. They are a product of this particular landscape.
Although the salmon were home throughout the Columbia River and Pacific Coast states, from the coastal rain forests to the high deserts, the streams in which they began and ended their lives all shared these attributes. Vegetation along stream banks provided shade and engineered the variety that salmon need during the freshwater phases of their life cycle. The rivers "interacted"with their flood plains by changing channels as flows increased and decreased. Small spawning streams were narrow, deep, and cool, with lots of riffles, pools and gravel bars. In the arid areas east of the Cascades, where fewer firs and pines grow, willows, aspens, locusts, and cottonwoods provided stream complexity.
For the rest of the article: http://www.open-spaces.com/online.php
Salmon and the Northwest
by Roy Hemmingway
Here in the Lower Forty-Eight, and in much of western Canada, natural habitat has almost vanished... Much that civilization demands for its sustenance has had a consequence in the fate of the salmon.
There is not much of it left. Of untouched salmon habitat there is almost none. Although salmon once occupied almost every ocean-seeking stream in the Pacific Northwest, the map where salmon go has been shrinking for the last hundred years, sometimes gradually as human forces slowly worsened the habitat, sometimes suddenly when millions of acres of habitat were blocked by dams.
Now to see the headwater-to-the-sea habitat where the salmon thrive in abundance, one must go to Alaska. Here in the Lower Forty-eight, and in much of western Canada, it has almost vanished. A century and a half of logging, farming, ranching, mining, damming, road building, and urbanizing activity has taken its toll. Much that civilization demands for its sustenance has had a consequence in the fate of the salmon.
The Aboriginal Habitat
Only in a handful of small pockets, miniature and isolated ecosystems, can there still be found habitat as it once was. On the Oregon coast, just south of the town of Yachats, is a little untouched watershed, barely eight miles from the headwaters to the ocean. Cummins Creek winds through a narrow, steep-sided valley. There, free from the ax and chainsaw, and now protected under the federal Wilderness Act, trees many feet thick rise to the sky, almost blocking out the sun.
Over years, as trees have died, they have fallen or been blown into the creek. Although the creek is small and shallow in many places, even in the low water of summer it is a struggle for humans to walk the streambed. Tree trunks are everywhere in the creek, creating dams over which the water must plunge, digging out pools that could soak a person up to the neck. Gravel bars have built up where the creek slows. The fallen trees push the creek from bank to bank, undercutting, and causing more trees, rootwads and all, to end up in the creek bed. All this adds up to stream "complexity,"a diverse set of stream conditions that create the habitat needed for healthy salmon.
In other streams, where the trees have not been allowed to mature and die and end up in the creek, what we see is a far more simplified stream. What most of us now envision as the pristine natural stream, bubbling along at a uniform pace smoothly to the sea, is not what the pioneers saw in many of the Northwest watersheds. Instead, west of the Cascades, they found creeks so choked with trees that in places they could not reach the water for the many layers of criss-crossing trunks over the streambed. On the larger rivers, log jams were common barriers to navigation, which had to be blown up or painstakingly picked apart by men who risked their lives not knowing when the jam would give way.
Whether for aesthetics or practicalities, man in the American West has systematically rid both large and small streams of the logs, boulders, and other "debris"that shape the stream and give life to salmon. Abundant beaver built dams on the smaller streams. The ponds behind the dams gave refuge to juvenile salmon from the high currents of winter floods and the warm waters of summer droughts. Now trapped and driven from much of their previous range, beaver once were as ubiquitous in the Northwest as salmon.
The simplified stream channels now seen everywhere and which have such dire consequences for salmon are in no small part due to the absence of beaver. Before the effects of man, creeks and streams and rivers moved across their floodplains, changing positions as high water cut new channels and dammed up old ones. Floods spread out into multiple channels, where the over-wintering juvenile salmon could find refuge from the fast water. In summer, these streams, slowed and directed by logs and boulders near the banks, dug deep channels, keeping the water cool throughout the hot days. It was into these conditions that the salmon evolved. They are a product of this particular landscape.
Although the salmon were home throughout the Columbia River and Pacific Coast states, from the coastal rain forests to the high deserts, the streams in which they began and ended their lives all shared these attributes. Vegetation along stream banks provided shade and engineered the variety that salmon need during the freshwater phases of their life cycle. The rivers "interacted"with their flood plains by changing channels as flows increased and decreased. Small spawning streams were narrow, deep, and cool, with lots of riffles, pools and gravel bars. In the arid areas east of the Cascades, where fewer firs and pines grow, willows, aspens, locusts, and cottonwoods provided stream complexity.
For the rest of the article: http://www.open-spaces.com/online.php
Thursday, November 10, 2005
Protecting the Salmon
This story, from the Bee yesterday, reveals the yeoman work being done by so many, in a quiet and deliberate way, to protect the salmon, so beautifully described as “a fish that has long defined the soul of West Coast waterways.”
He's a big fish in a series of small ways
Biologist's little tasks may loom large for salmon
By Blair Anthony Robertson -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, November 9, 2005
Joe Johnson spends much of his work time on a pontoon boat on a quiet stretch of the Sacramento River, working to save a fish that has long defined the soul of West Coast waterways.
He bakes under the summer sun and shivers through the winter rains, devoted to making his rounds.
A recent Friday found him near Knights Landing, north of Sacramento, tending to the two salmon traps he maintains with fellow biologist Robert Vincik.
Taken piece by piece, much of what Johnson does seems small, tasks that are practically insignificant and performed in obscurity.
He catches fish in the traps. He scoops out leaves and debris and sifts through them with his fingers. He checks the speed of the current, the clarity of the water, its temperature. On and on, he records the details and the data, then sends them along for others to analyze.
It's the little things that define his day's work. But Johnson, a 40-year-old biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game, has devoted his career to the bigger picture. He's one of many helping to ensure the salmon's poignant round trip endures in the modern world and withstands all of the sins against Mother Earth.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13834823p-14675336c.html
He's a big fish in a series of small ways
Biologist's little tasks may loom large for salmon
By Blair Anthony Robertson -- Bee Staff Writer Published 2:15 am PST Wednesday, November 9, 2005
Joe Johnson spends much of his work time on a pontoon boat on a quiet stretch of the Sacramento River, working to save a fish that has long defined the soul of West Coast waterways.
He bakes under the summer sun and shivers through the winter rains, devoted to making his rounds.
A recent Friday found him near Knights Landing, north of Sacramento, tending to the two salmon traps he maintains with fellow biologist Robert Vincik.
Taken piece by piece, much of what Johnson does seems small, tasks that are practically insignificant and performed in obscurity.
He catches fish in the traps. He scoops out leaves and debris and sifts through them with his fingers. He checks the speed of the current, the clarity of the water, its temperature. On and on, he records the details and the data, then sends them along for others to analyze.
It's the little things that define his day's work. But Johnson, a 40-year-old biologist with the California Department of Fish and Game, has devoted his career to the bigger picture. He's one of many helping to ensure the salmon's poignant round trip endures in the modern world and withstands all of the sins against Mother Earth.
For the rest of the story: http://www.sacbee.com/content/news/story/13834823p-14675336c.html
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)