That is what is obviously missing from this editorial from the Sacramento Bee.
Their recommendation...buy flood insurance...is okay, but if there is a way to prevent 500 year level floods, shouldn't that also be a strategy?
Of course it should be!
We posted the long-known 500 year solution on our blog earlier.
An excerpt from the Bee editorial.
“Ready yet to build an ark?
“That would be the understandable response to a U.S. Geological Survey study last week that puts into perspective Sacramento's potential for flooding.
“According to the study, California tops all other regions in the country for the risk of catastrophic storms – including one that could last for nine straight days and inundate Sacramento and much of the Central Valley.
“These types of intense tropical storms don't occur often – the last major one was in the early 1860s – and there is no telling when another could strike. The geological record suggests California has experienced such a storm every 160 years to 400 years dating back to A.D. 212, but the past may not be a reliable indicator of the future.
“Regardless of when one could strike again, the USGS report is helpful in reminding the public that California, and the Central Valley in particular, face an unacceptable risk of inundation in any particular winter. Flood-control districts, helped by state bond money, are working hard to upgrade levees in Yuba, Sutter and Sacramento counties, among others. Yet even when they complete their current work, most of these agencies will be able to achieve only 200-year protection, which translates to one in a 200 chance of flooding in any given year.
“That's a lot better than current standards, but still not strong enough to hold up against a 500-year storm, the scenario laid out in the USGS report.”
