Monday, August 06, 2007

Walters on Sausage Making

"If you knew what was in it…” the old adage has always applied more appropriately to politics than sausage making.

Dan Walters: Private law undercuts democracy
By Dan Walters - Bee Columnist
Published 12:00 am PDT Monday, August 6, 2007


The 15 "trailer bills" accompanying the stalled-out state budget contain countless words, many of which deal with matters that have nothing to do with the budget itself. As noted in this space previously, the trailers are often used as vehicles to slip into law provisions that bypass the ordinary legislative process.

One bill, Senate Bill 86, contains a two-pronged assault on democratic process that not only bypasses the usual procedure for making new law, but also transfers the regulations authorized by the new law to a private organization that's completely unaccountable to the public.

For much of the year, legislators and lobbyists for various interests have been negotiating over how state buildings should comply with anti-greenhouse gas emission policies, but one passage of SB 86 short-circuits those talks by decreeing that buildings the state builds or leases after Jan. 1, 2009, must meet standards of a private organization called the United States Green Building Council.

By all accounts, USGBC is a legitimate organization that acts as a forum for agreements on environmentally friendly building standards. But it's not the only organization doing that work. At any rate, the standards it decrees and the methods it uses to draft those decrees are matters of its internal politics -- including influence from those who support it financially -- and are shielded from input by the outside world.

Under SB 86, therefore, California taxpayers would be on the hook for whatever standards USGBC developed by whatever process it uses. Were this an isolated case, it might merit a pass, but it's part of a broader legislative tendency to avoid tough policy decisions by shifting them to unaccountable outside organizations.

A few years ago, for instance, then-Assemblyman (now Sen.) Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, carried a bill aimed at creating what could only be called dossiers on the families of children served by social service and health care agencies, authorizing amazingly detailed interrogations of kids about their family lives.

When one version of his bill didn't fly, Steinberg took the backdoor approach, requiring that children's programs use recommendations of the American Academy of Pediatrics in fashioning questionnaires. Whatever information the academy decreed to be sought would be sought, under law, from children under Steinberg's bill, which ultimately failed.